My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:47:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 12:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· Grind stumps and tree associated with house removal <br />· Acquire new U.S. West easement fi.om Blaine Edmundson <br /> <br />$1,700 <br />$I,000 <br /> <br /> · Move pole at 153rd Avenue NW for Great River Energy $15,693 <br /> · Order additional detour business signs $1,000 <br /> · Move U.S. West Utility cabinet at 153;a Avenue NW $35,000~ <br /> · Repair O'Connor's concrete driveway slab $1 <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the Great Rivers En~g,j~(~';}~:~and U:"S. West <br /> cabinet are within the easement or in the way of the project· <br /> <br /> City Engineer Jankowsld replied that they are located with{~e path of the pavement so they do <br /> need to be moved. The position of U.S. West is that';.'~'~_.need to h~?the same easement as <br /> prior to the project. They negotiated an easement ff:;i:n~'ih¢¢i:and owne~ ~0~.$1';000 and US West <br /> indicated the cost to move the box at $35,000. · ' <br /> <br /> Director of Public Works Kapler suggested receiving an itemized'statement from U.S West and <br /> Great Rivers Enerzv. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the~im'lity-companies use the fight-bt-Ways free, but when <br /> the City has a project then they Want th~:City to p~:~:'f~r'~i:hem to be mov3d <br /> <br /> City En~neer Jankowski replied that th~:i~Iity com~a~ah)'es are' ~6hhg their utilities at their own <br /> cost if they do not have an easement. '~,;?...-.-':.:~:.~.~¢" <br /> <br /> Councilmember Heiidriks-e~:i' suggested that tfe. City should begin charging utility companies for <br /> each m~le they have w~thm the'.nght-of-way. '~ <br /> <br /> Directo¢'~i;~ublic Works K¢~gr noted that An~' does charge for use of the right-of-way. <br /> <br /> Councilmemb~ Hendr~;&~'s[{ggeS~i~g the City Aaomey contact the utility companies <br /> and see if they would I~e the City to adopt an ordinance that would allow the City to charge for <br />.,.:?-(:i'"tl~ tfiSe, of the <br /> <br /> City Engine~k Jankowski replied' that they need to keep the project moving. <br /> <br /> Director of Pulfli'c Works Kapler inquired if the Committee would support signing an agreement <br /> to get work go~k without a dollar figure being attached to allow for further clarification. <br /> <br /> _Consensus of th& Committee was to direct the City Attorney to contact the utility companies and <br /> "-::J:explain that :~.~'~ City Council is upset with the charges and because of those expenses they will <br /> iiedd to. draft an ordinance similar to Andover to cover the costs. If the City is going to have to <br /> pa,;':{or ~h/s kind of cost, then they will have to collect funds to cover the costs· <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-22- <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/June 27, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br />I! <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.