My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:47:28 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 12:33:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNTY ~ "~?' <br /> ANOKA <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />~e Rmsey CiW Council conducted a re~l~ meeting on Tuesday, ~t 8, 2000, ~e <br />Rmsey Mu~cipal Center, 1515o No.hen Boulevard ~, Ramsey,, <br /> <br />Members Present: Mayor ~omas G~ec .~7,:? <br /> . Councilmember Sus~ E. ~d~:on <br /> Councflmember M~g~et C~iiy <br /> Councflmember T~ H~n~s n <br /> Councflmemb~ Geralff Zi~~ <br /> <br /> Co~um~ Development Ads,stat <br /> Dkectofb~bhc Works/Fke C~ef De~ <br /> <br /> CALL TO ORDE~:~ ~ <br /> <br /> c~ed the r~lar meeting of <br /> ~;~:~. '.::~C,Mayor Gamed2~ ~}:;J ouncil to order at 7:00 p.m. and lead in ~e <br /> Pledge of ~ieQ~ce to the pNg. ' <br /> <br /> CITIZEN I~UT, <br /> <br />~,??~ Hason, Ba~*:S~ kc., referenced ~e State of Mimesota ord~ce 4~.075 which <br />"~ut~fii~: cities to esf~b~h ~ekonable charzes for sto~ wat~ systems. He stated ~at the <br />response'i~e Ramsey R~kfdenFindicates that it does not ma~er if people have access to a sto~ <br />system or td:~t de~e~.(~ have runoff md felt ~at the CiW was not being entirely s~aight <br />lo,md, He q~stioned-%hat is just and reasonable and how much money ~e Ci~ needs to <br />maintaN ~e exlstmg sto~ water drainage system since all the new syst~s would be <br />conducted ~'3~ of a new development and paid by ~e developer. ~. Hanson also stated ~at <br />':~'5~.~::~? .he viewed ~:~'Rmsey web site and it had Ndicated ~at there ~e cu=ently 3,674 homes N ~e <br /> ~:~ Ci, and ~' <br /> ~$6.20 per household ~at wouid amount to $92,000 just in ~e residential portion of <br /> {h~?~se~t not including businesses. He also stated it is mentioned ~e Rarest, Resident ~at <br /> "wi~ a linle bit of glee" ~e businesses are being asked to pay more ~ households ~d <br /> b~esses do not absorb the costs but the residenU end up paying for the charge by ~e <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-80- <br /> <br />CiD' Council/August 8, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.