Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Hendriksen suggested giving the applicant the option of meeting City agree to waive relocation expenses if the City were to redevelop the site. Ms. Cook replied that she can purchase brick at a reasonable rate since that is th/~iness they are in and would have no problem with complying with City Code. She they proposed the vinyl siding because all of the surrounding businesses are would have a better appearance. Councilmember Zimmerman stated that this site is not in the they should not be required to do anything other than that of river crossing ~ere required to do. Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by plan approval to Chalich. Trucking contingent upon dated June 30, 2000, with the exterior walls facade to the truck terminal as previously approved. y, to grant site Review Letter applying brick Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Zimmerman, Connolly, Anderson, and Hendriksen. Voting N~: None. Case #3: Request for SitePlan R~View; B6ilermkers #647 Community Development Assistant Watakated City' '~i~iksey has received a request for site plan review from Boilermakers #~2, ~2~:'~51an prO2'~i~':~' to construct a training center addition onto an ~xisting building. The si{?!~ated at 945~'Highway 10 NW. Boilermakers are proposing a. 2~'~3ii ~: s~tU~b foot addition o~!~ existing building in t~he B-1 Business District. The proposed::~/ddition a~i~.;,.existing buildi4},, Co~plies with the 25% building coverage restriction/iDue to some rebi2ting in 1997 s~iih~erpretation of the side and rear yards has change&.' T~e result of thi.57j{ilthat the applic~Y~ii~'hld obtain a variance to the rear yard setback. The eXteri0r'o.f the f~nish m::~¢ buil~}mg i~s.~m¢~sed to consist of a combination of brick, Pained concrete block;.i;0ckf~e 4bhd~:e'~e 6 ;: a"cedar siding with asphalt shingles. The use of the cedar siding in the i~r0posed addition would be consistent w~th the existing building, but it does ;':'~f~'~ate from City cbae' and requires Council approval. Staff was or/ginally recommending use ~-f'~it'egraIly color trea~ad'eoncre'te block versus painted block but they have determined that the painted 6i'°ci~ is acceptabiaT!f parking spaces are provided, which is slightly deficient of the thirty-four s~ades required'i~'City Code, but adequate for the use of the building. All Proposed parking and d~ge areas ~1 be paved. No curb and g~tter are proposed. City code requires B- 612 concrete CUrb to be installed around the perimeter of the newly paved area. Staff recommended 'i~t the remainder of the current paved area also have B-612 curbing installed to ~'i~:.7:!:,. be in complia'..nr~ with City code. The new addition will create approximately 3,600 square feet '"':::('"'°f...additional paving between the building addition and new driveway. The drainage from the haw building will be largely absorbed in tufted and wooded areas. The driveway will drain northwardly to be the wooded area and southeasterly to the existing parking lot. It was also recommended that a curb be placed along the northeasterly edge of the driveway to prevent I I I City Council/August 8, 2000 Page 7 of 14 -85-