Agenda - Council - 09/13/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Hendriksen stated that it seemed as if the closing of T.H. g47 w~','~ving in area and duration. Director of Public Works Kapler replied that he has not been notified that th~: ~sure wili~'~eed the 1,000 feet as previously indicated, but will verify the information and ~p'~.:~t~ the Counml. 3) Met Council Letter Councitmember Hendriksen made the following commen.tS',6n the lett~rreceived from the Met Council regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan?::?:'(:i?:~, 1) The ,letter from the Met Council indicated that the is~::}i~rdiri~e do&'S not describe the City s role in tracking on-site septic systems. He stated th~-f:'::~gity has spent a lot of time determining what State Rule 7080 requires and requested that'~::i~tter be senKfrom the City Attornev explaining that he reviewed State Rule 7080 and tha?::~'his d~i~ion the ISTS ordinance requires all that is m~dat~a¢;by }tate Rule 7080 and the!}:~mprehensive Plan approval process should not be-!heldmp f~f'::~h~tiissue. Councilrnember Zimrnerman '~'eqUest~?that the the Council spent a considerable amount of time addressing th~!~ssue, f:'~?" 2) The third para~a~:::0._f the Met Cou~:i:l~ter addresses a proposed amendment to the ComprehensiVe: P'i~'h-i~,l~ut the motion th'~QWas made by the Council was to forward the Comprehen~iee Plan to'~; Met Council ~out(~pproval' so the proposed changes were not forwarded'~as an amend~b~t only as a draft ~::~uested that staff inform the Met Council. Coun~lmemb& ::Andersdn-'~ifiquested :that:::~i~ review the meeting minutes to verify how the Comprehensi,)¢~lan:~¢ 'f~'arded;~t~':i.tha Met Council. She also inquired if the proposed changes in densi¢:~0~ld constitute significant changes and be required to be sent back to the _~.~}Pl~hgCommissi~:n~(.t;:~pld pu~btic hearings. City Atto~eY Goodrich r~pl~:-"ti~at they were waiting on a response from the Met Council and based on theirr~sponse d'ete~ine if another public hearing would be necessary. Councilmemb~ ~derson:: noted that.she voted against the ISTS ordinance. '~:~:i}i~'!:Councilmeml~: Hendriksen stated that the Met Council made a statement that the proposed '~:":~endmen~S,make the plan internally inconsistent and the City had requested that Hoisington Koegter::ii ake the appropriate changes throughout the document and suggested that they contact the, Me( Council to inform them as to what is inconsistent and then make the appropriate cha, nges. -90- City Council/August 8, 2000 Page 12 of 14