Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember H enddksen replied that the Council wanted to correctly assess those peopt~i~ <br /> were creating the majority, of the runoff and he has not heard an argument that proved :thi~!.i'~ <br /> fair. .~;? ~' <br /> Mr. Peterson replied that if the City wants to talk about runoff then it has to .b6:i~ti~"t~imount <br /> of water that leaves the property that City has to deal with. But, if it is imp~!O~s area, {h~:~at <br /> is a different situation. %!i~_:~!i¥. ~ <br /> '~5~i:~ ~~-. <br /> Mayo[ Gamec stated that adding the fee to property taxes would be a{hUl~b:.benefn'to some but he <br /> doesnt think that is fair. He suggested that the City Admin/s~:~:sh6filg- schedule a meeting <br /> with the business owners and the City Engineer to discuss the0rd~Sance. '¢' ' <br /> <br /> Consensus of the Council was to direct staff to schedul~?~eeting to ;~pikin the storm drainage <br /> utility ordinance and the formula that is used. <br /> City Eng/neer Olson inquired if the City should continue with tl~'f~'~g,of the fee. <br /> Consensus of the Councd was to continue w~th the bdlmgs at th~s t~me':.?:5';?, ,-~: <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated t_h~'i.th~'Cl~7of Ramsey has 20,000::P~'~ie and 20 business <br /> owners were present in the audi6i~' requesting il{i{:d:b3~on, of the Co~'~!~h0uld be shifted to the <br /> residents which is not justified?if the l~ness owner~.:!tM~'i~ ~:: fa~{ii~he would like to hear their <br /> justification as to why the City should';}~m the ed'~f':kom ~i'i~e~Ple who produce the most <br /> <br /> Bernie VeVe, ,e~ii~-'~'i-Stated that the'~:js calling the storm sewer utility a maintenance <br /> charge and ClU~.:S~:;nea ho',~.m-.any miles of st6'~;~sew~ the City has th,a.t needs maintenance. In <br /> his opinio~.hs~re is very fe~ ~iles. He quesf~'~i~h:li;I{ow old the City s storm sewer system is. <br /> Mr. ve~e.'~kted that RamseY!ts not like other;c~'who have miles of storm sewer that go down <br /> eveW'¢itY bt~& land are. more,t-ha.n,a 1 O0 ye~' old. At the last meetmgk the Councd stated that <br /> someof the residential al'cas because in the spring some of the <br /> septic systems ma..Z.,~?'¢e working wa'i-?'z'Then the City should be creating funds for ditches in <br /> area." e':also noted that aerial photographs do not show elevations and businesses <br /> holding P'$nd§:as r~..uired by the City. Most of the soil in Ramsey is sand and there <br /> is no run'0~kom the bus~-nak':fri"the residential area. If the City needs funds for the residential <br /> areas, then i~:.slSould be asseSSed as any other project because businesses are not going to pay for <br /> these improv~nts when~:~hey are not causing the problems because they are taking care of their <br /> own runoff. ~¥eVe stated that the Council's decisions may set the course between separation <br /> between the b~esses and the rest of the community. <br /> <br />' :~ ~Lisa Rulek !i4345 Tungsten Street, Ramsey, stated that if it is a fact that businesses are creating <br /> runoff then they should pay a higher cost. To have a flat tax seems to be an unfair <br /> sh%/ing ~f taxes. She stated that she admired the way the decision was made. <br /> <br />City Council/October 10, 2000 <br /> Page 10 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />