My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:48:47 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 1:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/14/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plans to extend the fenced area. The applicant has a 6 feet by 24 feet kennel outside <br />foot by 12 foot kennel inside the garage. The Planning Commission reviewed the <br />and held a public hearing on October 3, 2000. The Planning Commission noted <br />were submitted by surrounding neighbors opposing Amy Ross's request to <br />dogs on a parcel. There were two neighbors at the public hearing who stated <br />Ross's request. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />to six adult dogs on the property. <br /> <br />to six <br /> <br />Amy Ross, 8100 154~ Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that she <br />period of time the dogs would be on her property would on <br />the dogs would be kept inside at night and supervised <br />be more than two dogs outside at one time. <br /> <br /> dogs, but th~ <br /> explained that <br />ide and t~t there would never <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired as to how ofter <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Ms. Ross replied that she usually shows the dogs once a monthl <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly clarified that there would only. be four <br />Would have six dogs. <br /> <br />Ms. Ross replied yes. <br /> <br />that she <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if'! <br />outside rather than having the entire yard <br /> <br />Ms. Ross explahi'~g:thaf:th~re is a 6 foot by <br />dogs would~?;kCePt m whert::she ~s not home <br />in the fe~?~ ~:~d. <br />Coun~fl~e~b~ <br /> <br />propo~ <br /> <br />keep the dogs in a kennel <br /> <br />attached to the garage that two of'the <br />is home, she would have the dogs out <br /> <br /> Ms. Ross explaiz it is a procedure is done to make a Clogs bark softer. <br /> <br /> Councilmbmber ~dersbm'in~uked as to why ~e procedure is done. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ross replied to reduce:~b barking noise. <br /> <br /> Counc~lmemb~'~endnksen stated that hs neighbor has m~y shelt~es ~d 10 ye~s ago he <br /> would have thdU~ht* can't someone put up with a dog bar~g once in a w~le, but when you ~e <br />~%~.'77;7: :,wor~ng in ~, ~}d and all the dogs do is bark they can drive you cr~. In hs <br /> situation <br /> he <br /> has <br /> "~?~hosen to ~e"With it, but if they ~e going to ~ant a condition~ use pe~it ~ey should include <br /> language.'"~at is strong enough to h~dle the situation when dogs are mmng up to the prope~ <br /> line and: 5ecoming a nuisance the conditional use pe~it c~ be revoked wi~out going ~ough a <br /> lonk~procedure. <br /> <br />City Council/October 24, 2000 <br /> Page 17 of 31 <br /> <br />-149- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.