My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:48:47 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 1:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/14/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Gamec called the public hearing to order at 8:21 p.m. <br /> <br /> Presentation <br /> <br /> Jankowski stated that the 2000 Street Maintenance <br /> City <br /> Engineer <br /> Pro <br /> ve <br /> individual projects covering 9.32 miles of street. The individual projects follows: <br /> <br /> · 00-01 Flintwood Hills Addition <br /> · 00-02 Ramsey Terrace <br /> · 00-03 Rum Acre Estates <br /> · 00-04 Crow's Unplatted (Section 9, 10, 15, and 16 w, #56) <br /> · 00-05 ReilleyEstates <br /> <br /> City Engineer Jankowski explained that each of the one and One-half <br /> inch bituminous overlay. Two projects, #00-01 and #00-05 · sewer projects constructed <br /> prior to the overlay of the project. The final quantities of the had been <br /> compiled or estimated (the on all five projects quantities on <br /> #00-05). The City's policy is to the total cost of the the benefited <br /> The cost of with and #00-05 <br /> property <br /> owners. <br /> is being completely funded storm The proposed <br /> assessment for each buildable follows: <br /> <br /> * 00-01 $784.10 <br /> . oo-02 <br /> · 00-03 <br /> · 00-04 )~43 <br /> · 00-05, $699.90 <br /> <br /> Paul Schmaltz, Street NW, Ramsey, stated that he understands that assessments are <br />~'~:;:::bas'e~'on lots rather thar~,~ontage and he does not object to that, but stated that he does have a. <br /> problem~.wi.th being assessed- ~{~:;two lots when the second parcel that he owns does not have <br /> City Engineer>~ihhkowski g{ated that he had talked to Mr. Schmaltz and advised him to attend the <br /> . · "'~'::~ ..... <br /> Counml meetmg~,;~ He explmned that ~t has been C~ty pohcy to assess each bmldable lot, and the <br /> lot that Mr. Sc~altz owns techmcally does not have frontage, but the lot m buddable. He noted <br /> that the City, h~}~?had similar situations where a lot did not have frontage, but was still assessed. <br /> ..i'5i,% <br /> C0uncilm~ber Anderson stated that technically the land is landlocked. <br /> ':~:...ti.' <br /> <br /> ,'.:ii <br /> <br /> City Council/September 26, 2000 <br /> Page 13 of 36 <br /> <br />-69- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.