My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/28/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 11/28/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:49:00 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 2:05:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/28/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Dock replied that she has not seen the proposed Comprehensive Plan, but the <br />property they are referring to is very different than the area up by 1534 Avenue. She <br />makes sense to place commercial and kigher density development in the open areas. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by COmmiSsioner <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners JoVan and <br /> ...... <br />Voting No: None· Absent: Comrmssmners Gnffiths and W~voda~}% ~ . <br /> <br />The ~ubhc rearm.,, closed at 8.08 p.m. <br />Comrmsslon Business <br />Chairperson Nmt called the reg'ular meeting of the Planning:: 'h b~k to order at 8:38 <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired as to the amount of land <br /> that <br />currently zoned R-3. <br /> <br />Pete Kattika, Hakanson two acres ~6~the current zoned R-3 <br />area is developable. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Johnson inquired as to could on the two acres. <br /> <br /> Community De.v.~16pm~?~.lrector Frolik that the current zoning would allow for 15 <br /> umts <br /> <br /> Mr. Johnsonn?ted that there are two bulldab[~:arcels on the outlot that ACCAP was originally <br /> propdsing to:.baild umts:~.:~m~havg,~nc~:[~'6ved those umts from the development. . <br /> <br /> Ms. Dock replie~th~:fihat development ~sroPosal was prior to the Sunwood Drive construction <br />~,~g.r'"~ai'~'-at .that point '~;e. areas were considered high ~ounds, but since the construction of <br /> Sunw0o&:Dnve those t'w[~.~ areas~:~are no longer eh~ble for development because they have been <br /> <br /> Motion by C~ssion~:?Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to recommend that <br /> City Council a'd~.pt Findings of Fact relating to a request to rezone property in Section 25 from <br /> R-I Urban Residential to R-.> Urban Res~dentml to accommodate the ACCAP housing project, <br /> with findinCs.O£fact #10 reading "will not". . <br /> <br /> F~u-~her ~'S~sion: Commissioner Johnson Stated that he sees the proposed rezoning as being <br /> conSi'stent' with the araa Comprehensive Plan that 'was 'put together with a lot Of community <br /> <br />Planning Commission/November 6, 2000 <br /> Page. 16 of 23 <br /> <br />-139- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.