Agenda - Council - 11/28/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-142- along the north line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter a distance of 570.55 feet; thence westerly along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 656. i6 feet, a central angel of 11 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds a distance of 125.98 feet; thence South 78 degrees, 59 minutes 56 seconds, tangent to last said curve, a distance of 116.48 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve, concave to the East having a radius .of 295.97 feet, a central angle of 90 degrees 47 minutes 28 seconds a distance of 467.89 feet; thence South 11 degrees 47 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to last said curve a distance of 164.54 feet; thence southerly and westerly along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 295.27 feet, a central angle of 101 degrees 11 minutes 13 seconds, a distance of 521.46 feet; thence South 89 degrees 23 minutes 42 seconds West, tangent to last said curve a distance of 210.53 feet and said centerline there terminating. (" Subject Property") 4. That the Applicant is proposing.to develop a multi-family housing project (twinhOmes, quad- town,homes, and a four-ptex) on an 11.3 acre site which includes the Subject Property. That 9 acres of the I 1.3 acre project site is zoned R-3 Urban Residential, but the portion referenced above in the legal description as the Subject Property .is zoned R-1 Urban .Residential. That the Subject Property to be rezoned is approximately 2.3 acres in size. That the Subject Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (M'USA) boundary. That the abutting property to the north is zoned R-1 Urban Residential, the property .to the west is zoned R-3 Urban Residential, the property to the south is zoned B-1 Business and the Subject Property is bounded by T.H.//47 on the east: That the Applicant is proposing a development that is compatible with the I2/21/99 draft Comprehensive Plan that has been forwarded to Metropolitan Council for approval. 10. That the proposed zoning amendment will not substantially adversely impair the use or market value of any surrounding property. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilrnember __ ·. , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof.' and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: RESOLUTION #00-11- Page 2 of 3