|
!
<br /> !
<br /> _ development has been established at a maximum~ of 7 units per acre in the draft co:
<br /> I plan. The developer is proposing to develop .~ 1 rental townhouse units, which ec
<br /> d nsity of _.6 units per acre. The site plan is proposing to construct six two-bed~ ~d six
<br /> · three-bedroom twmhome umts, one three-bedroom one level twinhome (Handic .~d unit),
<br /> ! one. fi. ve.-bedroo, m one level twlnhome (Group Home), three quadhome struc ~2~ ~!) that
<br /> contain two and three bedrooms, and one four-plex unit that has two one-b~m an{ $}~?!m,~ o-
<br /> · bedroom units. In the R-3 district, City Code requires that each t0wnho include a
<br /> · area ranging from 940 - 440 S uare feet The ' ' '"~':;':~:~' ~'
<br /> · , q · proposed tw~nhome ~d quad~dme structures
<br /> meet C~ty Code ara e re uirements Two u 'ts ' '~;~:;::~::~':~' '~:'~" - ~'~¢~-
<br /> o g q · m m the proposegT;ifO~?(-;.plex ~cture are not
<br /> ! pr_o.posln.g !o ~nclude a garage;..t~i.'s IS a deviation from City Cg~The ~:.~oUse units meet all
<br /> ~ of the rmmmum floor area, parking space, and lot coverage?~kements '?~tablished in the R-3
<br /> Urban district In the interaretation of the R 3 Urban ~¢;;o~ o~,~-' ~,- ' ....
<br /> I yard setback range ~s from 25 to 40 feet. In this case~i}tlSe max/mum~r.~ard setback would
<br /> -- apply and all structures should.be 40 feet from the:~;:':~'~Undafies i'~¢_ Because such a
<br /> _ si~m'Sficant amount of the site is 'encumbered with' wetla~'d~i!;and'!: ll4~r street, staff is
<br /> ~ recommending applying the 25-foot minimum to the structure e structures meet the 25-
<br /> · foot setback with the exception of the quadhome in the South~.omer or,Ce site. This
<br /> _ structure need only be adiusted 1 75 feet to meet ~h,~ ,,,~,,; ....,~ ~?~.,___&~.i · .
<br /> ffi reqmred to reduce the 40-foot rear _~dTg~ack to 9< r,,~, ~ ..... ~Z~:i~;~?~ .,, , . '
<br /> ~ . . .~..::~._,;z~-~.:~::~. :;.~¢:;~,.~.F -- -o-~. · nc lo~upu~%:,,:,~s~e Will derive one
<br /> access pmnt from Sunwood Dnve~T.~,6 ffV~':'= .
<br /> ;:~.~:.!:::~t~'~:~::~kP :%~4?sacs to the north~.afi~'south ends of Lot I
<br /> · ,. will also serve the townhome d'~I'3n~:~nt Th~'a~* .... u~..~ ,~4.x5"~ .,,, . , ,.
<br /> · m tampa· water and sewer fimhhes, x~i~e area w.~e:~?o~S~s6&::Dnve ~s proposed to be
<br /> dedicated as an Outlot. The pr0posed~}~tlot is::~3Omin :i~cupied by DNR protected
<br /> I wetland 685W and will be encumbered 15~:.i~ ~/ige and ~t~ easement. The exterior wall
<br /> · materials for all the. structures are propos~'~i;'~)nsist of m~ntenance free s/ding and asphalt
<br /> shingles for the ~6:~E~;;'CIii~):P4-3 district requ~xterior materials to consist of face fi
<br /> ., . .:~:~.,'.:.~:-~ ~z:,.i~, . ;~%. ~. b ck, natural
<br /> I stone, pre-c~soncrete, ~hled metal flame ~el~,,or glass. The proposed maintenance free
<br /> m siding deV/~' from the ~3 requirements '~:g(TMlt reauire Ci Council a
<br /> :~,.. , ..... ~ .... z~ ~ ty , p royal. The
<br /> '. ...... - ' Y - ~5'2~ TS? P
<br /> -- deve!9~m..~?...~fll be requ[...r.~::to obtmn a pe~?om the Lower Rum R/ver Water Management
<br /> · Orgafiization.. Calculation2::6f runoff oenem/e~d-'~,, the '~w~ ......... :" ...... ~, -
<br /> · ",i%,,',~ - ......):-:-:: .... ~ ;*;,~'~- ~a.~ ' I kl.[. WlK.)I. JIIIUII[ Wlll neecl [o De suomlrred to
<br /> -- the City En~ii'~},n,....~i?de-f'~'ttY db~j?"the storm sewer provided in Sunwood Drive can
<br /> .. ~,_.h,,~dle the additi6i/~,~noff that will be ~nerated by the development. The landscaping plan is
<br /> · ~i3!~!.iige~'~"~al. ly acceptablg,":h~SW?ver Staff is recommending additional trees and that a vafie of s
<br /> - .:..?:..;.':;j~:, de usea..ror munaauomnlkntmg~.instead of what is ;-'~4"~*=.~ ~ *~-~ ~:-- -' .........
<br /> .z~(:~.~.:~ . ~ . , .,,,:,..~ ~,-,,--~ ~.~ m~ ~m ptan rlanr Material
<br /> -- $?:.~~', ~cnectule.'.:,;i.f~~ site plan iiidicates that a 6-foot wood privacy fence will be located
<br /> ~,~ . ':: :,, . .~,:~,~:,~, - parallel to
<br />If H~ghway #47.~::~!s meets;;.~?'City's fencing standards established in the R-3 Urban district. The
<br />~}!~, townhouse d~0Pment % proposing a recreational play~ound area that will need to be
<br />~ "it~i?~¢;~:. maintained by ~i developer.
<br />
<br /> '~'~!~;?:!i;(s ,Commission~:,~ociscak inquired if all of the units will back up to the wetland or the road, and
<br /> I · '%!: that none ab~:'the existing neighborhood on the west.
<br /> '¥: '."!(':
<br /> comr~urfity Development Assistant Wald replied that that was correct. She explained that there
<br /> I is::aWetland and Sunwood Drive between the existing neighbors and the proposed development.
<br />
<br />Planning Commission/November 6, 2000
<br /> Page 18 of 23
<br />
<br />-191-
<br />
<br />
<br />
|