Agenda - Council - 11/28/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Consensus of the Commission was that the normal complaint review process would be Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to ,red~end that City Counc/1 adopt Findings of Fact relating to Cathleen Artrnan's request fo~!~:¢~n~aal use Motion Camed. Votmg Yes: Chawperson NLxt, Commissioners Johnson, K0cis~, and · Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissid~'~"Q2ocisc~'Tio recommend that City Council approve Cathleen Artman's request fos,a/:;.conditionaL::~tSe permit for a occupation based on the findings of fact. ~;!!~i}~!ii~'~' '~:~'12~:~-~7~' Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissi0riei'sJo~a0n, Kbciscak, and Reeve. Voting No: None. '* R,q,,est fo,' Sit R view of & W o . eff Community Development As~} W.-~{ stated'~th~i},O~ City of R~sg'5~7:has received a request , for site plan review fi:om M&~ Hold~:Company. ::~;"~;f.~::~'lar~}is proposing to Construct a 3,200 square foot off-sale liquor store. ~ area is:7~'~rally-l~-~' south of 146t~ Avenue and west of Armstrong Boulevard (County Ro~z~8,32,/2~e site ~s.~0ned B-3 Highway Busmess, off- sale liquor facilities:are:i~ermitted in the :~9~y Business"~district. The structure meets all -Highway Bus~iT;~&¢:afiR::,*equirements ~.is in compliance with the 35% lot coverage restnctton. ,..Th~s~te plan ~s'~9_cosmg to =mn .a,,c~s!:~':~pm 146 Avenue and another access pomt will be d~:.8-a' fi-om an e~g access off 0~:}C~4~~ Road #83 (Armstrong Blvd.) that also serves.:th'~:'~asis Market ~'~:-~deo store. ~':';CIidveways and off-street parking areas will be pavea:~d g~ked witl-gB:6Jt.2:curb~ng. ~::extenor building materials are proposed to consist of v~nyl s~dmg;:~ .,comnad'0~'-fielct}.~on2e;:q"he proposed s~dmg deviates fi:om the H~ghway Busmess arch/teen,Standards and wall need C~ty Counml approval. Screenmg ~s not reqmred ~ ' <'?'~ .... are west ~~~o;the adjacent'}~eels zoned Highway Busmess and Industrial. The portion of the ~¢~ property~')~'~-proposmg to;:~e':abs.ea.t,of Ntun-nnous pavement and concrete curbmg. The apphcant .~5;~ needs to ~Faifv if the wesf'~o~r6n of the property will remain in its current state, be irt/gated or [~ neutralized. 'Stil=fIs.reco~endmg that the area have some type ofmamcured lawn. The famhty ~ will be server'S, an on-'~i;t'~' septic system. The site is.proposing to share an existing well with- ~k. the business ii~,~ediatety to the south. The applicant will need to get the State Health '~ Department's }~roval to share a well between two propemes. . ~!~4!iiChairperso.45Nixt knquired if staff had viewed the color renderings. - ' c~fin~'ty Development Assistant Wald replied no. -212- Planning Commission/November 6, 2000 Page 7 of 23