Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt stated that based on the denial, there is no reason to proceed with cases <br /> 5 and 6. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sacco stated that they have certain obligations with the property own~:;tliat: they <br /> would like to fulfill and requested that the Commission address those cases;~C~;~'' i~:~i';).~,~ <br /> <br /> the subdivision so the Co~ssion could act on Case 5. <br /> <br /> Case ~5: Request for Sketch Plan Renew of a <br /> Acres; Case of Lyndale Ter~al Company' <br /> <br /> Co~u~ Development Assist~t Wald stated ~t~t~yndale Te~inal Comply has <br /> applied for sketch pl~ review to replat Outlo~:X;~:'~B~ C and G:~er's Bend 3 <br /> Addition into ~o c0~ercial lots, generally 1;Cated ~'~}h?. c~'~ ~.H. ~7 ~d <br /> ~mo Street. ~e prope~ consists of approximately 6.80:a~e~ and is proposed to be <br /> pla~ed into ~o lots. Lot 1 will be approximately 1.40 a~es and::Lot 2 is 5.40acres. ~e <br /> prope~ is cu=ently zoned B-1 Business. ~e proposed p~:"'meet t~: half acre <br /> mi~mum lot size requirement,<:5~?lOO,foot width and 150 fo~ deP~?~equirement <br /> establ}shed in ~e BusMess ~'~'~:~'~"~':~esult of a prior a~eem~fit:~ith respect to <br /> myer s Bend Park and thd:Rfi~"~er Bha~:CB~dpr, t~s pa~i:Cular area has been <br /> exempted from any p~k d~dicatio~quirements? :~ff'~eco~ended approval of the <br /> sketch pl~ contingent upon compli~, wi~ Ci~.~taff reGe~:~e~er dated December 1, <br /> <br /> Motion by ChM~6n.3~ixt, Seconded by~o~issioner Wivod~ to approve ~e sketch <br /> pl~ fos.:Hg~ay Acr~'~'j}~d recomend~at: Ci, Council ~ant final plat approval <br /> conting~at'~pon complia:~ce with Ci~ Sta~R~¢~e'~ le~er dated December 1, 2000. <br /> <br /> Moti°n :C~ed. Vo~n~.,Yes:..~,,~ha~on N~xt, Co~ssmners W~voda, Gn~ths, <br /> Kociscak~'~ ReeV~.:::V6fing N~. N0~': Absent: Co~issioner Jo~Son. <br /> <br />..~:~;?¥~:?Case ~6: ReqUest for Site Plan Review; Case of L~dale Terra,al Company <br /> Moti~:,~y:Chai~ersd~:~, seconded by Co~issioner Kocisc~, to reco~end mat. <br /> CiW Co~fi)l~deny site~ approval of the proposed site pl~ for Holiday A~es based on <br /> the denial ~fthe rezoh~g. <br /> <br /> Motion C~d. Voting Yes: ChaiCerson Nixt, Co~issioners Kocisc~, Griffins, <br /> Reeve, and~Wivoda. Voting No: None. Absent: Co~issioner.Jo~son. <br /> <br /> ?TCasd~:~7~' Proposed Ordnance to Amend Park Dedication Requirements <br /> <br /> 4.~~: PUblic Hearing <br /> <br />i <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />-220- <br /> <br /> <br />