My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:50:12 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 2:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/12/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
328
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
forms fi'om these parcels. If negotiations with the businesses are not successful, the City of <br />Ramsey will not be held liable for the contract.amount and the land will be acquired tl-u'ough the <br />condemnation proceedings. To accomplish this with the low bidder, it is likely that a <br />supplementary agreement be signed by both parties. The tow bid contractor, Erickson <br />Construction, Inc. would like to commence utility construction and grading for the project <br />beginning this fall. As part of the specifications, there is a completion date for the utilities of <br />December 15, 2000. This was written into the specifications so as to allow the utility trenches an <br />opportunity to settle over the winter before construction of the street occurs. <br /> <br />Councilmernber Zimmemmn stated that typically the City obtains the land before a contract goes <br />ont and inquired who decided to let out the bids. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that the Council gave the approval. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman stated that in the future the City should acquire the property before <br />letting out the bids. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson noted that the project would not be authorized to move forward without the <br />signing of the proper documents. <br /> <br />Councilrnember Zimmerman inquired as to how long the bids were good. <br /> <br />City Engineer Olson replied that most bids are good for 45 days, but noted that it is possible to <br />request an extension with written docmnentation from both parties involved. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich suggested adding the following wording to the motion "..subject to the <br />City Attorney's approval that the appropriate property rights have been acquired." <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson questioned the difference between a right-of-entry agreelnent versus <br />ownership of the property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that a right-of-entry agreement is a preliminary agreement to <br />allow the City to enter on the property and begin the project and then negotiate with the property <br />owner for the damage. If negotiations carmot be met, then the City would have to go ttzrough <br />eminent domain. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendfiksen questioned the status of the Maken property condemnation. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that once the funds are deposited with the com-t in the amount of <br />the approved appraisal the City is given possession 90 days later which would be December 1st. <br />on the Maken property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to when the construction was anticipated to begin. <br /> <br />-20- <br /> <br />City Council/October 10, 2000 <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.