Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Hendriksen suggested the following for #5: add - after program <br />- "consistent with Metropolitan Council policy as described to the Ramsey City <br />Council on August 10, 1999. Mr. Koegler noted that the description would have <br />to be attached to the plan - or inserted. He stated he would like to see the minutes <br />from that presentation. <br />Page V -15: no comment on changes <br />Page V -16/17: Councilmember Hendriksen commented on the third paragraph - density bonuses <br />- and wondered why we are not using the Met Council definition. He suggested <br />striking everything from the paragraph following. . . rent of $684 per month. My. <br />Koegler stated he would reword that. Councilmember Hendriksen suggested that <br />the next paragraph should start with "As part of the PUD pro'cess, density credit <br />may be given. .. The phrase "would receive density credit" should be changed to <br />"may be given density credit". The rest of the paragraph should read as follows: <br />A maximum density of 5 units per net acre (for example) would then yield 200 <br />units. The developer may be allowed to reduce lot sizes or mix housing styles in <br />order to preserve some or all of the remaining 10 acres in the Greenway as <br />permanent open space. This open space would not be left as unman aged open <br />space (or an outlot) but required to be preserved as permanent open space through <br />park dedication or some land preservation tool such as a land trust or permanent <br />conservation easement acceptable to the City Council. <br />Page V17: Last paragraph - Councilmember Hendriksen suggested crossing off "Mixed R-l <br />Low Density. Councilmember Anderson pointed out that Future was misspelled. <br />Page V18: It was noted that the zoning map would be looked at - and what's added should <br />be what's in low density to medium and high density. <br />Page V20: My. Koegler noted numbers 1, 2 and 3. No comment on the change in #1, #2 is <br />newly added - no comment. Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if #3 is even <br />needed - and suggested it be stricken. <br /> <br />Mr. Koegler stated that he will go back through the plan and anywhere density bonuses occurs, <br />he will review it to see if it belongs there. This brought the plan up to Page V -21 - and those <br />were previous changes. Mr. Koegler stated that he would make the suggested changes and get <br />the document back to My. Norman. He understood that this is a little closer to what Council <br />wants. My. Norman stated he would look at minutes from the joint meeting with Met Council to <br />find out the description talked about for page V -14. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />The work session adjourned at 7:33 p.m. <br /> <br />Respect~lllly submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Work Session/November 17, 1999 <br />Page 2 of2 <br />