My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/09/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/09/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:59:18 AM
Creation date
9/8/2003 3:15:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
03/09/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />suggested drafting findings of fact and an agreement that will protect the City from having to <br />build caretaker homes in the future. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the Council could reaffirm in the findings of fact that they do <br />intend to enforce City Code allowing one home on one lot and the home was only constructed <br />due to certain circumstances. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman inquired if Council was satisfied with the turnaround concerns in <br />the cul-de-sac. -' <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that the Planning Commission was satisfied <br />since the road was identified as a dead-end. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler stated that he is familiar with the cul-de-sac and is <br />comfortable with the situation. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted that he discussed the issue with the bus company and they stated that there <br />was only one person entering onto the bus on the street so there currently has been no reason to <br />drive down the road. If it was desired for'the bus to drive down the road, they would be able to <br />accommodate. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich recommend adding item #5a to the findings of fact stating: "That the <br />City Council reaffirms the necessity of maintaining the City Code Section 9.11.01 providing that <br />there shall be no more than one main building on a tot as said section as important City Planning <br />and Zoning Regulations generally intended to benefit the health and welfare of the comments. <br />That because of this finding the City generally opposes granting variances to this requirement (of <br />City Code 9.11.0)." He also recommended adding item # 5b to the findings of fact stating: <br />"That because of the unique circumstances by which the second home was built on the subject <br />property, the Council deems it responsible to grant a Conditional Use Permit for the 2''d home, <br />however, the Council may reject any attempt to use this Conditional Use Permit approval as a <br />precedent to avoid the requirements of section 9.11.01 in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the wording "will be" in item #8 of the findings of facts <br />should be changed to "is", and item #I 0 should address the sale of the property requirements. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that the issue is addressed in the CUP. If at any <br />time the home is not being used for.a caretaker then the property owner would be required to <br />subdivide the property. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Connolly, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to adopt <br />Resolution #00-01-036 adopting Findings of Fact #0509, as amended, relating to Mr. Kveton's <br />request for a conditional use permit for two dwellings on one parcel. <br /> <br />City Council/February 8, 2000 <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.