My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/14/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 12/14/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 10:00:47 AM
Creation date
9/8/2003 3:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
12/14/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contributions by individuals, businesses, organizations and institutions to matching grants <br />from various governmental agencies and foundations will receive higher consideration. <br /> <br />E. Funding EligibiIity Under Existing <br /> <br /> Programs - There are a number of DNR <br /> programs, as well as other agencies and organizations which fund the protection and <br /> restoration of natural, scientific, and scenic areas. Sites eligible for funding through <br /> these programs should be considered for protection by the Metro Greenways program if: <br /> a) it is unlikely that funds from other programs are or will be available to protect the site, <br />b) the use of Metro Greenways funds is not viewed as supplanting the budgets of other <br /> programs, and <br />c) involvement does not jeopardize the Metro Greenways program or other program(s). <br /> <br />Imminence of Threat -Many natural areas and potential corridors are threatened by <br /> development pressure, fragmentation and other factors. In some situations, only a short <br /> period of time may be available to protect an area from being permanently lost or <br /> significantly degraded. Higher priority should be given to those sites with an immediate <br /> or high level of threat. In some cases, immediate actions may be required to protect the <br /> site, necessitating the use of non-profit intermediaries. <br /> <br />IV. Overall Program Goals <br /> <br />Once all of the sites are evaluated, an additional set of criteria will be applied individually <br />and collectively to the potential sites to help determine their final rating. <br /> <br />A. Visibility - Certain sites, by virtue of their size, characteristics, location, and history can <br /> further natural resource protection and provide attention, identity, and stature to the Metro <br /> Greenways program. Sites and projects which bring these important benefits to the <br /> program will receive strong consideration. <br /> <br />Range of Project Types - Many types of sites will need to be protected to achieve the <br /> vision of Metro Greenways. As part of an overall list.of.sites, it is advisable to have <br /> representative examples in each of the following categories: <br /> <br />* Protection of regionally-significant natural area and/or corridor <br />* Protection of locally significant natural area and/or corridor <br />* Restoration of altered/degraded site <br /> <br />Geo-Political Distribution - Protection sites should be distributed throughout the region. <br /> As part of the overall package, it will also be beneficial to have at least one site in each of <br /> the following categories: <br /> <br />*Outside of the proposed MUSA boundaries <br />*Within existing or current proposed MUSA boundaries <br />*Within the fully developed urban core <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.