My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/20/2001 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2001
>
Agenda - Council - 11/20/2001 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 12:30:01 PM
Creation date
9/8/2003 3:30:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Special
Document Date
11/20/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Enstrom stated he was confident the City Council would ~ant the extension. He requested <br />the permit be recommended for denial at this meeting so he could bring the issue to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson withdrew his earlier motion to continue to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated he does have a concern of people being laid off <br />questioned that if for some reason Mr. Enstrom was allowed to keep <br />was made, what would the hours be. <br /> <br />winter. He <br />a decision <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied the hours are listed in the permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer questioned what the remedy would be i~>Enstrom did <br />· hours as set forth by the permit. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that the City Council the permlt:;;'~ <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he is sympathetic to the to continue and to the <br />neighbors who have concerns. <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, secofid~':~;~ :~.rson r ,that City <br />Council adopt findings of fact, unfavorable't~!j:~e al~¢! ~ating Enstrom s request <br />for a conditional use permit to grade and ex~7~:,soils~ ~a~{:} of fact 18: That the City <br />does not have sufficient envcpmne~tal infonn'afio~egardlng the proposed use; and finding of <br />fact 19: That the applican~ Js!h&.'l;i~e~ed for buS~ Use. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Vofiiig"Yes: Cha~'~son Nixt, e~ssioners Johnson, Brauer, Sweet, and <br />Watson. Voting N6:~N0ne. Absen~f?~~si:oger;!~ciscak and Reeve· <br /> <br />Mr. Enstrom stated he d6¢s}~:;~k~' a targe f~ md has done ~s. as pa~ of ~s f~ing practice. <br />He added':'~':~'aoesn't a¢Tu~:.~the hours he c~ work. He stated ~s is ~own as a di~ f~ <br />where:a fi~ prodU~ 5s.'sold. <br /> <br />M~ti~n by Co~issiofi~;7:Jo~sod~;'~seconded by Ch~erson Nixt to reco~end thru Ciw <br />c~U~fl deny Jo~ Enstr0~k~. request for a conditional use pe~it to ~ade ~d expo~ soils. <br /> <br />Motion Caffied. Votia~*;~es: Chaicerson Nixt, Co~issioners Jonson, Brauer, Sweet, and <br />Watson. Vb~k. No:::~. Absent: Comssioners Kocisc~ and Reeve. <br /> <br />Mr. Enstrom stated 'if the project is stopped at ~is time, ~e CiW would lose a ~emendous aspect <br />of the CiW. It could become ~ eyesore and subsequently, devalue the neighboring homes. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/November 5, 2001 <br /> Page 9 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.