My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 01/04/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:21:27 AM
Creation date
9/8/2003 3:39:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/04/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Hendriksen stated that one of his concerns is that when they are dealing with an <br />urban area that has been recently platted the cost is relatively Iow, however when there are larger <br />lots in the rural area the cost is higher and the need is not beneficial. They are trying to fill the <br />need in both areas of the City. <br /> <br />4) Consider Right-of-Way Ordinance <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the Public Works Committee reviewed a case <br />establishing a right-of-way ordinance, which would govern the usage of City right-of-way by <br />utilities and organizations wishing to locate their equipment and structures. The ordinance is <br />modeled after a League of Municipalities model ordinance. The Committee had the following <br />concerns, which they directed Staff to further investigate: <br /> <br />1. Does the ordinance adequately allow for a surety to cause the removal of equipment and <br /> utilities, if necessary? <br />2. How does this ordinance compare with the ordinance supplied from the Cable Commission? <br />3. Report on a franchise ordinance to charge for the use of the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if there was a way to adopt the ordinance and then revise it as needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman replied that Staff is gathering information and will be brought back <br />next month. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen questioned if Staff determined if it was the same ordinance that was <br />submitted by the Cable Commission. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the ordinance was 98 percent the same as the ordinance that <br />was adopted by the City of Anoka and reviewed by the Cable Commission Attorney. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen requested that the City Attorney put the ordinance into a final draft. <br /> <br />5) Report from Meeting with Bill Rademacher and Discussion of Barium Street <br /> Drainage <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that Staff reported that Bill Rademacher was willing to both <br />sell or donate the eastern portions of Outlot A to the City, depending on whether the City would <br />support an access fi'om T.H. #47 into Outlot A and Bill's Superette. Staff pointed out that <br />MnDOT does not possess the right-of-access to Outlot A, but also that an access at that location <br />may be inconsistent with the T.H. #47 Corridor Plan. The Committee recommended that Staff <br />provide a review of the corridor study to determine whether an access exception may be possible <br />in the location desired by Rademacher. Also, Staff was to contact MnDOT to receive their <br />position on such an access. <br /> <br />City Council/November 23, 1999 <br /> Page 18 of 25 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.