My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/06/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:21:53 AM
Creation date
9/9/2003 8:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/06/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, Jensen,. <br />LaDue, Terry, and Thorud. Voting no: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Commissioner Jensen requested that the reference to radio frequency engineer be a licensed <br />engineer in the same way that a structural engineer must be Iicensed. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden explained that there are few licensed radio frequency engineers, and there is <br />no link between a licensed and qualified radio frequency engineer. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to retain the language as presented in Section <br />9.15.05(a)(I). <br /> <br />Mr. Alexander requested that specific conditions be stated in Section 9.15.05(a)(4). <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to add No. (5) to Section 9.15.05(a) to state that if the <br />existing tower is not suited to have a second user and rebuilding the structure may be more <br />expensive than building a home tower, then a new tower would be allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Alexander stated that Section 9.15.07 (b) requires new towers to be of a monopole design, <br />unless one of three conditions exist. He requested that radio frequency fRF) be removed as a <br />condition because the Telecommunications Act of 1996 prohibits local governments from <br />regulating radio frequencies. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Terry to remove "radio frequency <br />(RF)" from Section 9.15.07(b). .' <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Holland, <br />lensen, LaDue, and Thorud. Voting no: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Section 9.14.07 (c): Mr. Alexander noted that towers 'are not built with guy wires. The <br />requkement that if a tower were to fall over it must collapse within the setback area limits the <br />ability to set towers in different areas. Monopoles are designed with a weak point, so that if the <br />tower is stressed, it will break and fall straight down and collapse rather than falling over. Most <br />likely the other half will continue standing. <br /> <br />Commissioner lensen asked what warranty exiSts to say how a tower will collapse. <br /> <br />Mr. Alexander answered that the manufacturer of the tower provides the structural information. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holland, seconded by Commissioner Jensen to add the words, "unless <br />ofmonopole design," to Section 9.15.07 (c). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, Jensen, Deemer, <br />LaDue, Terry, and Thorud. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 4, 1997 <br /> Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.