Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin January 10, 2011 1Volume 51 No. 1 <br />The court interpreted S 100.987's provision that a planning unit <br />"may plan for and regulate the siting of cellular antenna towers" as <br />meaning that a planning unit has the "discretion to enact regulations <br />pertaining to cellular antenna towers ... but this exercise of discretion <br />is not a condition of jurisdiction." Thus, as Iong as the area of the pro- <br />posed cellular tower has a planning unit that has adopted planning and <br />zoning regulations, the planning commission of that planning unit has <br />jurisdiction over matters relating to cellular tower placement and con- <br />struction, not the PSC. This is true "regardless of whether the planning <br />unit has enacted regulations specifically relating to cellular towers," said <br />the court. <br />Here, the court concluded that because the local planning unit had <br />adopted planning and zoning regulations that governed the area where <br />Bluegrass Wireless proposed to construct a cellular tower, the local plan- <br />ning commission had jurisdiction over the proposed tower, not the. PSC. <br />See also: Kentucky Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Jeffers ex rel. Jeffers, 13 S.W.3d <br />606 (Ky. 2000). <br />See also: Combs v. Hubb Coal Corp., 934 S. W.2d 250 (Ky. 1996). <br />Case Note: In its decision, the court added that, where a plan- <br />ning unit has adopted planning and zoning regulations but has <br />not enacted regulations specifically related to cellular towers: "the <br />applicant will ... still need to meet the general restrictions of the <br />particular zone in which the proposed cell tower is to be con- <br />structed." For example, the applicant will need to meet restric- <br />tions such as, among others, permitted uses within the zone or <br />height and setback requirements. <br />Zoning News from Around the Nation <br />ARIZONA <br />In November, Proposition 204 —the Arizona Medical Marijuana <br />Act —was passed. Under the new law, cities and towns may adopt "rea- <br />sonable regulations" regarding the location and operations of medical <br />marijuana dispensaries and growing operations. Only 124 dispensaries <br />will be allowed statewide, and every one of Arizona's 15 counties will <br />have at least one dispensary. The law also permits qualifying patients <br />who live more than 25 miles from a dispensary to grow up to 12 of their <br />own plants. <br />Reportedly, the Arizona Department of Health Services hopes to pres- <br />ent a final draft of related rules by February, with final rules published <br />© 2011 Thomson Reuters 11 <br />