My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2011
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/07/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:06:52 AM
Creation date
4/1/2011 2:22:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/07/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minn. Stat. § 617.242 <br />Northshor <br />Experience, Inc. v. <br />City of Duluth, MN <br />442 F.Supp.2d 713 <br />(D.Minn. 2006) <br />Minn Stat. § 462.357, <br />subd. lg. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.357 <br />A.G. Op. 59 -A -32 <br />(Aug. 18, 1995). <br />A state law, enacted in 2006, requires that anyone intending to open an adult <br />use business provide notice, 60 days in advance, to the city where the <br />business will locate. The law includes numerous other provisions focused on <br />regulation of adult uses businesses. The new law is the subject of an <br />injunction issued by a federal district court; the court fmds that questions <br />about the law's constitutionality are valid and rules that the city may not <br />enforce the new law. Until the constitutional questions regarding the new law <br />are resolved, cities probably should not rely on it as the sole mechanism for <br />regulating adult entertainment establishments. <br />Instead, cities may consider taking proactive measure to adopt local adult use <br />regulations. However, adopting any regulations of adult uses is legally <br />complex and the city attorney should be involved in the drafting of any adult <br />use ordinances. <br />H. Restricting Feedlots <br />Zoning ordinances that regulate feedlots must comply with certain <br />procedures outlined in the Municipal Planning Act. When a city considers <br />adopting a new or amended feedlot ordinance, it must notify the Minnesota <br />Pollution Control Agency and commissioner of Agriculture at the beginning <br />of the process. <br />A local zoning ordinance that requires a setback for new feedlots from <br />existing residential areas must also require that new residential areas have the <br />same setbacks from existing feedlots in agricultural districts. This <br />requirement does not pertain to a new residence built to replace an existing <br />residence. A city may grant a variance from this requirement. <br />At the request of the city council, the city must prepare a report on the <br />economic effects from specific provisions in the feedlot ordinance. <br />Assistance with the report, in the form of a template, is available from the <br />commissioner of Agriculture, in cooperation with the Department of <br />Employment and Economic Development. Upon completion, the report must <br />be submitted to the commissioners of Employment and Economic <br />Development and Agriculture along with the proposed ordinance. <br />1. Extra - territorial zoning and joint <br />planning <br />1. Extra - territorial zoning <br />A city's zoning authority may be extended by ordinance to unincorporated <br />territories within two miles of its boundaries, unless that area falls within <br />another city, county or township that has adopted its own zoning regulations. <br />Where zoning is extended, ordinances may be enforced in the same manner <br />and to the same extent as within the city's corporate limits <br />22 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA. CITIES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.