Laserfiche WebLink
UPDATE FOR MINING AND GRADING ORDINANCE <br /> Brian E. Olson, City Engineer <br /> <br />PW CASE # <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />In;q999, the City had some difficulty enforcing the removal of a berm on C.R. #116. Residents <br />wanted to extend their lawns by the removal of soil that was placed for the purposes of a berm. <br />Also within the last few years there has been some issues raised by residents regrading their yards <br />to redirect the flow of storm water runoff. The City Council directed staff to review the current <br />policy regarding the removal or addition of soil to see whether or not the mining and grading <br />ordinance should be reconsidered. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The current portion of Chapter 9 in the City code that deals with these issues states that a <br />conditional use permit shall be applied for all grading, mining, and filling operations with the <br />£ollowing exceptions: <br /> <br />· No additional permit shall be required if the grading, mining, and filling operations are being <br /> done as a part of a subdivision plat, site plan, or planned unit development. <br />· No permit shall be required if the grading, mining, and filling op~erations are b. eing done by a <br /> public agency and is incidental to construction or maintenance ot streets or utilities. <br />· No permit shall be required for grading of individual lots by~ less than 3 feet in depth, filling <br />o£ less than two feet at any point and which does not intertere with surface drainage in the <br />area. <br />· No permit shall be required for grading, mining, and filling operations that require removal of <br /> less than 400 cubic yards of earth material. <br /> <br />City Staff has solicited response from 15 other communities throughout the Twin Cities <br />metropolitan area. We received response fi.om 7 communities of which 3 did not have <br />restrictions or ordinances in place. Three of the remaining communities are similar to the City of <br />Ramsey in that they differentiate between commercial grading and residential operations and <br />require a permit if export of materials exceed 100 - 1000 cubic yards of material. <br /> <br />The last ordinance that we received, submitted fi.om the City of Savage, has a three tier approach. <br />No permit is required for any excavation that would export soils less than 25 cubic yards. A <br />minor excavation permit is required for export of soils greater than 25 cubic yards and less than <br />2000 cubic yards. This permit requires the filing of an application, supplied by the City, and the <br />supply of a legal description of the property and copy of a,section map showing the proposed <br />grading and export plan. Any operations that would require the export of soils greater than 2000 <br />cubic yards would qualify as a commercial operation and would require a special use permit. <br /> <br />One of the reasons that other communities do not have any ordinances that control residential <br />grading projects is that those operations are already controlled to a point. Any operation that <br />alters the drainage patterns in an area that creates damage to adjoining property would be the <br />responsibility of the property owner that has that work done. The City of Ramsey also addresses <br />that issue in the current policy as represented by the third exception as stated above. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br />Based on discussion <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works <br /> <br />PW: 9/19/00 <br /> <br /> <br />