My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/12/11
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
04/12/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2025 10:59:42 AM
Creation date
4/7/2011 4:24:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
04/15/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PDF <br />complete <br />Click Click Here to upgra <br />Unlimited Pages art <br />Your complimentary <br />use period has ended. <br />Thank you for using <br />PDF Complete. <br />to submit this plan to the City Council for approval and <br />1 development plan and all the other stuff will flow from <br />Commissioner Tossey asked if we aren't really making more housing units. <br />Mr. Lazan responded that we are actually down to half. <br />Commissioner Wise stated that in talking about selling property go get money for the park — <br />what amount will it take for the park or can we use some of that money for infrastructure. <br />Mr. Lazan stated that the rule of thumb is 1/3 land, 1/3 transaction costs, and 1/3 profit for the <br />developer. If you take 2/3 and sell it all, there's a different number. This land you did not <br />anticipate selling so you have 2/3 available to send downstream for the park. <br />Commissioner Ramsey stated we still need a dog park. <br />Commissioner McGlone stated that these residents are all worked up for a park that was never <br />really dedicated as a park. Take a lesson from that and be very careful what we draw on maps. <br />Mr. Lazan stated that the remainder stays mostly the same. Looking at the A, B, C, and D <br />parking districts — D will most likely be private. <br />Mr. Lazan continued that we are asking for the HRA's approval to submit the application to the <br />City Council for approval/adoption of the new development plan. <br />Discussion ensued relating to the public process. Commissioner Elvig suggested hosting an open <br />house. <br />Motion by Commissioner Elvig and seconded by Commissioner Ramsey to approve the draft <br />plans submitted by staff and that the HRA asks Council to support them. <br />Motion carried. All voted in favor. <br />2) Consider Proposal to Complete COR Marketing Package and 2011 ICSC <br />Conference Attendance <br />Deputy City Administrator Nelson stated that as part of the preparations for the ICSC <br />Conference in 2010, marketing materials were prepared to represent The COR. The <br />Development Management Team has continued to work on the marketing materials within the <br />budget that was provided for in 2010. We are proposing to take the next step in completing the <br />marketing package. She noted that a proposal from Sharp Creative was attached to this case for <br />discussion and consideration. She reported that a large amount of time has been spent on the <br />marketing She stated that the piece that's not addressed in the case is the production side. She <br />asked the HRA to consider what they might like — paper — electronic — or both. The other piece <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / February 1, 2011 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.