My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1999
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
9/9/2003 11:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/1999
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> I <br /> i <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Steve Jankowski, P.E. <br /> <br />- 3 - January 7, 1999 <br /> <br />~f.~{*he~t~'~is found to be ~c'~cl at that time, the contractor will be authorized to order <br />equipment and proceed with <br /> <br />~tified~e, then the pay item for the completion of the ~ <br /> <br />The meeting also featured discussion about the access point on CSAH 116 that is located <br />between the Rum River Bridge and TH 47. A1 Pint stated that he thought that there would be <br />difficulty with the property owners if effective measures were taken to reduce cut-through traffic. <br />He said that, ideally, the access point would be a city street located closer to the bridge, and <br />left-turn lanes would be added to CSAH 116. <br /> <br />My impression of these comments is that he thought that providing a safer facility for the cut- <br />through traffic would be acceptable (if not desirable) to Mn/DOT. It also seemed that he <br />believed that the cut-through traffic is a symptom of the lack of a north-south city street along <br />the Rum River and not a problem totally related to the absence of a signal at 142nd Avenue. <br /> <br />Obviously, before this issue is pursued any fu:ther, discussions with Anoka County and the <br />property owners must take place. <br /> <br />DRE/JRD/smf <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.