My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/09/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1999
>
Agenda - Council - 03/09/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 3:39:45 PM
Creation date
9/11/2003 2:32:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/09/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roger A. Pelerson <br />John G. Engberg <br />Bruce R Grostephan <br />Mark W. Bay <br />Ronald G. Marks <br />Reuben R. Speclor - 1972 <br /> <br />Peterson, Engberg & Peterson <br /> Attorneys and Counselors at Law <br /> 700 Title Insurance Building <br /> Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2498 <br /> (612) 338-6743 <br /> TELECOPIER (61.2) 338-4281 <br /> <br />IBY: <br /> <br />February 23, 1999 <br />CERTIFIED MAIL <br />RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED <br /> <br />Ramsey City Clerk <br />City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard N.W. <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />RE: Improvement Project #99-07 <br /> <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br /> <br /> This letter shall constitute written objection to the <br />proposed assessment for the costs associated with the above- <br />referenced project. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 429.061, <br />subd. 2, please present this written objection to the presiding <br />officer at the hearing to consider this improvement project <br />scheduled for Tuesday, March 9, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council <br />Chambers. <br /> <br /> This objection relates to the failure of the proposed <br />improvement project to meet the requirements of the Minnesota <br />Statutes on the assessment of property for the cost of <br />improvements. It is my position that the proposed project will <br />not provide an increase in the market vat~e of the land proposed <br />to be assessed for the improvement, as measured by what a willing <br />buyer would pay a willing seller for the property before the <br />improvement and then after the improvement. It is my <br />understanding that this is the legal standard which is required <br />before a property can be specially assessed. See, EHW Properties <br />vs. City of Eaqan, 503 NW 2d 135 (Minn. App. 1993). <br /> <br /> I also object to your Notice of Public Hearing mailed to the <br />property owners on the grounds that it failed to meet the <br />requirements of Minnesota Statutes 429.061, subd. 1, by failing <br />to include the information required by that statute, including, <br />without limitation, the taxpayer's appeal rights and procedures. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.