Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />PART A: REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION TO THE MORATORIUM AND DISCUSSION <br />ON POLICY REGARDING URBAN SERVICES <br /> By: Cindy Sherman, Community Development Director <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Rick Burnham is seeking site plan review to develop a 12,960 square foot office/warehouse <br />building on Armstrong Boulevard (CSAH 83). The development is proposed on Lot 1, Block 1, <br />HY-10 Ramsey 2nd Addition. A detailed discussion of the site plan is attached as Part B to this <br />report. <br /> <br />Observations: <br />The application is located within the moratorium area west of Armstrong Blvd. The land use on <br />the property had been discussed as a potential location for transitional residential. However, <br />following further evaluation it was determined that the wetland to the north of the site provided a <br />good buffer to the residential use to the north and that this parcel should be designated as places <br />to work which is consistent with the present zoning. <br /> <br />A related issue to the comprehensive planning process is the policy regarding the availability of <br />urban services to sites prior to development. Brad Scheib of Hoisington Koegler Group, the <br />City's consulting planner, wrote a letter of review regarding a similar site situation in the area <br />(Attached). We did not have him prepare a report for this site since the issues are similar. As <br />pointed out in Mr. Scheib's report the issues for the City to consider go beyond urban services <br />and include long-term impacts on the area prior to conclusion of the comprehensive plan and <br />related ordinances. <br /> <br />Staff believes that the site plan for C. R. Concrete is of a design and layout that would be allowed <br />in our urban service area. They are proposing to clean up an existing site and construct a <br />building with quality industrial architecture and paved parking with concrete curb and gutter. <br />While the building is small for the site the owner does have plans to expand the building and the <br />site gives them room to grow. The are not requesting exterior storage and any future requests to <br />do so would require action by the City. Since the site is designated for places to work staff <br />believes that this is an appropriate use. A Development Permit is attached which the applicant <br />would be required to execute that requires them to hook up to City services within 2 years of <br />them becoming available. The staging plan calls for urban services in 2005-2010, this is a <br />general date for extension of services, and it is not a schedule for installation. <br /> <br />With the site plan as proposed and if the applicant is willing to sign the agreement committing to <br />hooking up to public utilities then staff believes an exception to the moratorium should be <br />granted. <br /> <br /> <br />