Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~O.~CASE ~ <br /> <br /> DISCUSSION ITEM <br />PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION ON ADMiNiSTRATIVE POLICY REGARDING <br />RECRUITMENT POLICY FOR RECLASSIFIED POSITIONS <br /> By: Joyce Pruitt Hottinger, Administrative Services Manager <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The City has several temporary positions that Staff has inquired about reclassifying to regular <br />s't. atus municipal positions. Also in this discussion, Staff has questioned the opportunities <br />available to employees (both temporary and regular status) when applying for other regular <br />positions with the City. <br /> <br />In an effort to develop a standard and objective recruitment policy for reclassifying temporary <br />positions to regular status positions, I am proposing City Council discuss an administrative <br />recruitment policy. <br /> <br /> In general, the City should use caution in utilizing "word-of-mouth" recruitment procedures due <br />· :.to their potential to have a disparate impact on a protected class. For example, in Thomas v. <br /> Washington County Sch. Bd., 915 F. 2d 922 (4t~ Cir. 1990), the school maintained a practice of <br /> posting vacancies for teachers only in schools. An Afi-ican-American applicant, who learned of <br /> the vacancy after it was filled by a white applicant who was the spouse of a teacher in the district, <br /> brought a Title VI suit seeking injunctive relief under disparate impact theory. The court held <br /> that the "word-of-mouth" hiring practices used by the district disproportionately excluded the <br /> hiring of minority employees, and granted injunctive relief. <br /> <br />It is generally advisable that if a work force, or even a segment of a work force, is dominated by <br />a particular class an employer should avoid "word-of-mouth" recruiting as it can perpetuate the <br />existing composition of the workforce. With that consideration, I am proposing Council consider <br />an administrative policy, with a fairly conservative approach. If a temporary position is to be <br />reclassified to regular status, the recruitment policy will be as follows: <br /> <br />· If a formal "open" process has been conducted to hire an employee for a temporary position, <br /> and the temporary employee is the most desirable person for the newly classified regular- <br /> status position, then it may be reasonable to promote the temporary employee to the regular <br /> status position. <br />· In the case where a temporary }mployee was acquired through a "closed" selection process, <br /> the newly reclassified position would be subject to an external/"open" recruitment process. <br /> <br />Another issue which has been raised includes an option to post job vacancies <br />internally to provide existing employees (both temporary and regular status) a "first" opportunity <br />to post for a position. Some other cities do provide an internal posting when they are <br /> <br /> <br />