Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> Did You Know? <br /> 4/95 <br />Regulating Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchants <br /> <br />Cities have both statutory and common law authority to regulate peddlers, solicitors, and <br />transient merchants. Minnesota Statutes, sections 329.06 and 329.15, grant to cities the right <br />W regulate and license peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants above and beyond the <br />statutory requirement for them to obtain county licenses. M.$. 412.221, subd. 19, echoes the <br />provisions of chapter 329 for statutory cities. Most charters provide home role charter cities <br />with the ~rne type of explicit authority. M.S. 437.02 restates the authority to reguhte and <br />license transient merchants in all cities. In addition, the courts have held that reasonable <br />regulations of peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants are valid exercises of a city's <br />police powers in protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public against an activity <br />that can become a nuisance. Unfortunately, while it is clear that cities can not totally ban <br />peddlers, solicitors and transient merchants, it is not clear how far cities can go in exercising <br />their regulatory authority over them. <br /> <br />Because this is a highly litigated matter, and because cities risk being held liable for federal <br />Section 1988 penalties if they adopt and.try to enforce an unconstitutional regulation, cities <br />are strongly urged to involve their city ~tttorneys before adopting any regulation. Further, <br />before a city decides it has to do something about the problem of peddlers, solieiWrs and <br />transient merchants, it should balance extent of its current problem or. the problem that could <br />develop if ~ch activities are left um-eg~l~?_od, against the risk of litigation over any attempted <br />enforcement of a regulation. For those Cities that decide they have to do something about this <br />problem, the following suggestions should be carefully considered and applied to develop the <br />types of provisions that have either been upheld in court or that should be defendable if <br />challenged: <br /> <br />-- Define all terms. Peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants are not recognized <br />by the courts as being the same. Peddlers, also known as hawkers, go from place to <br />phce to sell goods that are delivered i~t the time Qf sale. Solicitors, also known as <br />canvassers, go from phee to phce to obtain orders for goods or services that are to be <br />delivered or performed at a hter time, or to eollec, t donations. Transient merchants <br />are generally persons who sell their merchandise from a vehicle or other portable <br />shelter, or from an empty storefront, and who do not intend to remain in business at <br />any one location for more than a temporary period .of time, usually know more than a <br />few weeks. <br /> <br />--" Exempt specific groups .from the definitions. The courts have held that those <br />who make initial contacts with property owners or occupants for the purpose of <br />establistiing a regular delivery route, as well as people making deliveries to customers <br />on their regular route, are not the type of nuisances intended to be defined and <br />regulated by peddler, solicitor, and transient merchant regulations. Likewise,. sellers <br />at whole sale making direct sales to retailers of the items being sold, have also been <br />exempted from the definitions of peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants. <br /> <br /> <br />