Agenda - Council - 05/11/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Peddler, Solicitor, Transient Merchant Model Ordinance Reference List The following list of cases and reference materlat~ were used to draft the League's Model Peddler, Solicitor, and Tramient Merchant Ordinance dated 4/95, as won az the "Did You Know?" column for tho April I995 edition of Min,esota Cities Magazine. Summaries of cases cited within the listed cases and reference material may also have been relied on. Court Cas~ (citation only): Breard v, City_ of Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622, 71 S.Ct. 920 (1951). City_ of St, Paul v, Brig_es, 85 Minn. 290 (1902). City of St. Paul v. Tracg~r, 25 Minn. 248 (i878). City_ of Waseca v. Braun, 206 Minn. 1:54 (1939). Excelsior Baking Co. v. City_ of Northfield, 247 M!nn. 387 (1956). In Re Whit¢, 43 Minn, 2.50 (1890). Red Silk Hosiery. Mill~, Inc. v. City. of Portland. et. al., 268 U.S. 325, 45 S.Ct. 525 (1925). State v. Claudio. et.al., Case Nos. 91082723, 91082706, 91082727 Pounh Distxict, State.of Minnesota (1992). State Ex ReI, Mudeldng v. Parr, 109 Mi,n. 147 (1909). State v, Pher~0n, 205 Minn. 573 (1939). State v. Schmldt, 280 lVflnn. 281 (1968). Stat.e Ex ReI, v, Wagen,r, 69 Minn 205 (1897). De.fruitions: Defirfifion Exempfion~: Licensing v, ReCstering: Cases by Primary Ordinance Topic (cim omitted, see above): City of St. Paul v. Briggs Excelsior Baking Co. v. City of Northfield · State v. Claudio,et.al. State Ex ReI. Mudeking v. Parr City of St.paul v. Briggs Excelsior B~ng Co. v. City of Nor&field State v. Claudio, et. al. State v. Schmldt I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I