Laserfiche WebLink
you are doubling what is available for what is already a saturated market and he doesn't feel this <br />is going to raise revenue. Right now they are aggressively marketing them and it is a very slow <br />market and to think these new lots are going to generate more sales and more income is not very <br />realistic. <br />Commissioner LaMere asked if this doesn't go forward now what would be the timeline for <br />doing a park in that area. <br />Park Supervisor Riverblood stated there isn't a lot of momentum of satisfying the initial park <br />improvements for these residents without atleast a sale of a lot. He stated the proceeds may not <br />be available right away but it may add momentum for park improvements. <br />Commissioner Bennett's concern is if we don't move forward now with this recommendation <br />that we lose the park altogether and asked what the HRA's perspective is. <br />Development Manager Lazan stated it has been the HRA's goal to maintain as many community <br />components as possible and stated it is fully developable piece of property and that's where this <br />is at. To date he has looked at marketing kind of a different product type as much as possible. <br />Commissioner Barr is concerned we already have parks that we are struggling to maintain and <br />that we continue to still have budget cuts. <br />Commissioner Barr stated she is not comfortable going forward with this right now if there were <br />80% of the lots already sold then she would feel comfortable with it. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner LaMere to recommend to City, <br />Council and the HRA to create, develop and sell more residential lots that minimize the impact <br />to the area from a total number of home sales. Give us the ability to look back and take into <br />account some of the additional recommendations from the public of what that park ultimately <br />looks like, and get to those park improvements and ultimately we end up with a park and a <br />dedicated park there and limit the amount of potential growth. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chair Olsen, Commissioners Bennett, Fyten, and LaMere. <br />Voting No: Commissioner Barr. Absent: Chairperson Shryock. <br />COMMISSION /STAFF INPUT <br />Parks Supervisor Riverblood reviewed that City Council at City Council Work Session last <br />Tuesday authorized staff to move forward with placing a Resolution on their agenda for March <br />22 °d for applying for MN DNR Trail Grants. These grants are very competitive and if awarded <br />he reviewed the project schedule for the two trails listed in the City's CIP for 2012 -2013 and also <br />what has been presented to the Commission previously. <br />The other item Park Supervisor Riverblood discussed was the Environmental Expo. He <br />explained he spoke with Chairperson Shryock earlier that day and she thought what might work <br />is to place this on the Commissions agenda for April. She also discussed scheduling a work <br />session before or after that meeting to talk about shift coverage and what things were needed at <br />the Expo. Separate from the Expo, Chairperson Shryock would like to have conversation <br />Park and Recreation Commission/March 10, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />