Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br /> <br />Statement of Mike Hanley, Ramsey resident, <br />concerning proposed "no wake" ordinance on the Rum river <br />June 10, 1998 <br /> <br />Mr. Mayor and Council members. Thank you for the opportunity to present .....m..y statement before <br />the council. <br /> <br />This past year, Andover and Ramsey council members have continued {alking about establishing a <br />no-wake ordinance along at least some portions of the Rum river bordering their city limits for the <br />expressed purpose of controlling erosion along the river banks allegedly caused by watercraR <br />wakes. <br /> <br />If erosion from watercraft wakes is really the issue (and the real issue may be something else I'I1 <br />touch on later), then it follows that the success of any ordinance designed to control erosion on. <br />the Rum fiver hinges on this overriding question-how much erosion is occurring naturally, <br />how much is the result of human activity and what, if anything, can government do to <br />control it.9 <br /> <br />There are two monumental assumptions being accepted and publicized by proponents of this <br />ordinance. The first of these assumptions is that erosion on the Rum river has only now in modem <br />times been observed and that such recently observed erosion is now a "crisis" requiring <br />government action. The second assumption is that this erosion is caused by the activities of man <br />and that it can be controlled by government by use ora restrictive "no wake" ordinance. <br /> <br />It is the view of myself and others that this ordinance, although well intentioned, would have little <br />or no effect towards controlling the natural erosion of the Rum_fiver. Instead, we believe that <br />such an Ordinance would only serve to needlessly restrict the freedom of those citizens who enjoy <br />boating and fishing on the river and who feel that they too have a legitimate right to be able to <br />navigate a public waterway at a reasonable speed. We also believe that this ordinance would <br />prove to be a continual waste of time and money for both the City Councils and the taxpayers of <br />Ramsey and Andover, since it would involve the installation and removal of marker buoys every <br />spring and fall. <br /> <br />Let's consider looking at some common sense river Geology in the hope of better explaining this <br />view. I will say right up front, that I am not a river geologist or hydrologist by training, although <br />I have studied some Geology and have spent a lot of time on the river. I am primarily relying on <br />my own 48 years of accumulated experience, firsthand observation and empirical evidence <br />gathered by me while living on and with the Rum river in my following comments. <br /> <br />Anyone who has been aware of the springtime headlines and news stories th6 past few years <br />would be hard pressed not to have noticed the devastating results of flooding along the <br />Mississippi and its tributaries in 1993 and most recently, along the Red river near Grand Forks. <br />Despite the best efforts and preparation of residents in those areas (including sometimes massive <br />and expensive public works levees, dikes, etc.) those rivers exhibited with force and fury a mind <br />of their own. <br /> <br /> <br />