Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Hendriksen stated that on the plat drawing it looks like there is a road. <br />We may end up with a worse situation - three lots and no public road. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik responded that with a metes and bounds subdivision, there will be no platting <br />of a road; the access will continue to exist as a private driveway easement between <br />property owners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that she would like to go forward with better planning <br />in the City and metes and bounds seem backwards. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if the metes and bounds subdivision would create <br />another buildable lot. <br /> <br />Attorney Goodrich stated that the right to a building permit is not inherent with a lot split. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik stated that a metes and bounds subdivision is not intensifying the current <br />status of the property as it relates to the number of homes serviced by a private drive <br />easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated he is surprised the City would permit subdivision of a <br />property without public access. He suggested tabling action on this case until answers <br />are developed for all the questions Council raised. <br /> <br />It was noted that Mr. Danner was present. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hendriksen and seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman to <br />table action on the Danner request until the following questions are researched: 1) How <br />does this case compare to Council action in the case of Pettersen Estates; 2) Give other <br />examples where the City has done a subdivision without fi'ontage; and 3) Present future <br />subdivision plans for the Danner property - plans 20 to 40 years from now. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Hendriksen, Zimmerman <br />and Anderson. Voting No' None. c. <br /> <br />Leo Anderson, Planning Commission Chair, pointed out that the Planning Commission <br />never considered a metes and bounds subdivision. He asked that the Commission be kept <br />apprised of the Danner case. <br /> <br />Case #7: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Northfork Itasca Point; <br />Case of Northfork, Inc. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that North Fork, Inc. is requesting preliminary plat <br />approval of another portion of the Northfork P.U.D. located on the north side of Lake <br />Itasca. the plat is to be named Northfork Itasca Point and consists of approximately 35 <br />acres proposed to be platted into seven single family lots and permanent open space to be <br />deeded to the Homeowner's Association in the form of an outlot. The plat is in the <br /> <br />City Council/May 25, 1999 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />