Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 9: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION <br />Fanance: 115 Clay Cliffe Dnve <br />City Council Report; I1-11-08 <br />(cont.) Variance. A variance is a relaxation of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance where <br />such deviation will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owing to <br />conditions unique to the individual property under consideration and not the result of <br />the actions of the applicant, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in <br />unnecessary and undue hardship. <br />Variance By state statute, there are three definitive criteria that all variances must address. The <br />Criteria: three criteria are as follows, along with staff's analysis of the applicant's request. <br />A. Is the variance request reasonable? The hardship requirement does not mean that <br />a property owner must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without <br />the variance. Rather, the property owners must show that they would like to use <br />their property in a reasonable manner that is prohibited by the ordinance. <br />Staff Comments: Staff finds this request is reasonable as the proposed lanai is <br />conforming to all setbacks specific to the lot lines defining this lot; most notably it <br />meets the two eight (8) foot setback requirements from the northwestern and <br />northeastern property lines. The nonconformity relates to the required OHW <br />setback from the lakeshore on the adjacent lot. This lakeshore setback cuts into <br />the otherwise buildable area on the northeastern side of the home, making it <br />difficult to locate a porch off the back of the home. Staff finds this criteria is <br />met. <br />B. Does the application present unique circumstances? <br />Staff Comments: The lot in question presents a unique circumstance in that it <br />must comply with an additional setback not related to the lot lines defining this <br />lot. This additional setback limits the landowners ability to construct a porch off <br />the rear of the home that would otherwise be allowed. Staff tmds this criteria is <br />met. <br />C. If approved, would the variance alter the essential character of the locality? <br />Staff Comments: Granting of the requested lakeshore setback variance would <br />not impact the character of the neighborhood. Please note that the Clay Cliffe <br />Homeowners Association architectural control committee has reviewed the <br />proposed lanai and has approved the plans. It is the Homeowners association that <br />owns the adjacent lakeshore, so they would be the only party potentially impacted <br />by the proposed construction. Staff imds this criteria is met. <br />The applicant must also establish and demonstrate compliance with the variance <br />criteria set forth in Tonka Bay City Code Section 1004.02 Subd 3. before an exception <br />or modification to city code requirements can be granted by the City Council. The <br />following are the nine additional criteria established by code, along with staffs <br />analysis of the applicant's request(s). <br />U. ProposalsTiled by Employee Ben GozolalCity ofMendota HeightslExample Rep --TB Variance and CUP_2008.doe <br />Page 4 <br />City of Ramsey I Proposal for Routine Professional Planning Services <br />28 <br />