Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />That the proposed building and accessory building are proposed to be faced with rock face <br />block wtfich is in compliance with the architectural standards for the B-3 Highway <br />Business District. <br /> <br />That the proposed building and accessory building comply w/th the 35% lot coverage <br />restriction in the B-3 Highway Business District. <br /> <br />That the ~site plan orientates the building on the Subject Property such that the retail use <br />fronts on Hwy. #10 and the mini-storage garages will be to the rear and adjacent to the <br />railroad tracks. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />That if granted, the conditional use permit wilt not grant the Applicant special privileges <br />that are denied by the City Code to other properties in the commercial area. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will be designed so as to be harmonious and appropriate in <br />appearance with the existing or intended character of the vicinity 'and will not change the <br />essential character of the area. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br /> residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or market <br /> value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />I6. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring <br />uses. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />18. That the proposed use not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any <br /> persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of glare. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #99-09- <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />