Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH, AND MINIMUM LOT <br />WIDTH AND STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK <br />IN A SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT; CASE OF NORTH FORK, INC. <br /> By: Zoning Administrator Sylvia Frolik <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />North Fork, Inc. is in the process of platting Northfork Itasca Point, 7 single family residential <br />lots on the north side of Lake Itasca. The lots are subject to the regulations for the Shoreland <br />Overlay District for Lake Itasca. As such, the lots are required to be at least 200 feet wide at the <br />road frontage or building setback line. In addition, the riparian lots or lots adjacent to the lake <br />must be deep enough to provide for a 200 foot structure setback from ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br />Additionally, City Code restricts cul-de-sac lengths to 600 feet. <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />In accordance with State Statute, owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property were <br />notified of the request for variance. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The average lot width of the 7 lots at the road frontage or building setback line is 1,400 feet (7 x <br />200), but on a lot by lot basis, Lot 5 is approximately 30 feet shy of the 200 mark. In telephone <br />conversations with DNR staff, they do not see a problem with a slight deviation from the lot <br />width requirement on any single lot, as long as a total frontage of 1,400 feet for the 7 lots is <br />maintained. <br /> <br />In order to minimize destruction of mature trees and distUrbance of existing topography, the <br />developer has requested a variance to the 200 foot structure setback from ordinary high water <br />mark on Lots 4, 5 and 6. In 1989, Minnesota Rules were amended to decrease the recommended <br />structure setback from ordinary high water mark in the shoreland districts from 200 feet to 150 <br />feet. Ramsey's shoreland regulations have not been updated since the Minnesota rules were <br />amended. Staffhas been working .with DNR to accomplish this task. In telephone conversations <br />with DNR staff, they do not object to the proposed variances to the setback from the ordinary <br />high water mark as long as the State recommended minimum of 150 feet is maintained. The <br />developer's plan maintains a structure setback of at least 156 feet on Lots 4, 5 and 6. <br /> <br />The lots are proposed to receive public access from the extension of a 'cul-de-sac that is <br />approximately 1,000 feet in length. Severe slopes in the area result in a penninsula of land not <br />wide enough to accommodate two roads. <br /> <br /> <br />