Laserfiche WebLink
Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos reviewed the park dedication fee. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly questioned how much park dedication was received from the <br />retirement housing that is being constructed. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that he was not sure in that it was a city sponsored project <br />but would research the information. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly questioned the mount of the trail fee. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated $150 per household noting that none of the funds have <br />been used on any projects as of yet and that the trail fee does not apply to commercial properties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connelly stated that using park dedication money only in the district that the <br />money was received does not give the City much flexibility with the funds. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rolfe stated that when park dedication from a development is used in another area <br />of the City there is the opportunity for lawsuits to come about. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that there is flexibility with the funds, stating that the <br />City used funds from all districts to pay for Community Park #5 since it was going to be a <br />benefit to the community. He stated that he will research any legal liability and update the C.I.P. <br />and bring it back to the September meeting. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Cook, seconded by Commissioner Asfahl, to request staff modify the <br />C.I.P. draft to reflect the discussion and the recommendations made by the Finance Officer. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Cook, Commissioners LaMere, Droegemueller, Asfahl, and <br />Rol£e. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johns and Ostrum. <br /> <br />The Commission and Councilmembers discussed the current park dedication fees and the need to <br />increase present rates. <br /> <br />Case #2: Address Park Dedication Proposal/Request <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that the City received a request from Jim and Cathy Gusts <br />in regards to park dedication on a parcel north of County Road #116 and east of Dysprosium <br />Street. ~' <br /> <br />Commissioner Droegemueller questioned if there are any trails proposed on County Road #116. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that there will be a trail along County Road #116 most <br />likely on the southside. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/August 12, 1999 <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />