My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/14/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
1999
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/14/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 12:57:48 PM
Creation date
9/12/2003 3:46:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/14/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Tom Gamec <br />Ramsey City Council <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard NW <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Alena Hunter <br />14628 Helium Street NW <br />Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />August 10, 1999 <br /> <br />Dear Mayor Gamec and Ramsey City Council Members, <br /> <br />As I am unable to attend tonight's council meeting, I would like this to be accepted as my <br />contribution to the discussion regarding the Sunwood Drive Extension (Case #4 on your agenda). <br /> <br />As you are aware, Sunwood Drive has been scheduled to be extended between County Road 5 and <br />Highway 47 for some time now, long before any residents occupied the area. It is plainly clear to <br />anyone (resident or not), that the "temporary" barriers are just that. Roads do not end with an <br />orange striped, movable barrier such as those. When a road ends, a bit more permanent fixture <br />is used, such as a concrete curb, or cul-de-sac, for instance. You are also aware that the State of <br />Minnesota has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to this project. Denying this <br />extension would not be in the best interest of the residents of Ramsey. <br /> <br />p~ach one of you sit on the Ramsey City Council at large. You represent ever!t resident of this city. <br />Not a particular "precinct" which houses a particular group of people. If you deny this extension, <br />not only are you acting on behalf of a select group of residents, but you are negatively impacting <br />every resident of this city. <br /> <br />If the state of Minnesota demands a repayment of monies, forwarded to Ramsey for this project, <br />due to its incompletion, where will the money come from? Since the city can't even afford to pay <br />100% of the cost of street maintenance, how would this "bill" be paid? Here might be a likely <br />scenario. Since the city can't arbitrarily raise taxes to cover this particular expense (due to state <br />mandated levy limits), is it likely that to pay such a huge bill, money might have to come from a <br />different fund, and services and/or another prOject would possibly be reduced or canceled. If that <br />is the case, every citizen is affected negatively by a reduction in city services. <br /> <br />As has been evident in the past, with the issues on 149th Avenue particularly, the city of Ramsey <br />does not have enough east-west routes. Consequently, drivers have used residential streets to <br />access major thoroughfares. The completion of Sunwood Drive would help reduce that <br />residential street use, as the extension of County Road 116 did. <br /> <br />I caution the council to think long and hard about exa~l!t who it is they represent. Please take <br /> ~_se points into consideration, along with the fact that a lot of time and money, not to mention <br />~.ommitment to other entities, has already been spent on this project up to this point. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.