My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
1998 - 1999
>
1999
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:21:27 PM
Creation date
9/15/2003 8:32:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/15/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PW CASE #~,~ <br /> <br /> DISCUSSION OF REMAINING UNPAVED STREETS IN RAMSEY <br />By: Director of Public Works Dean Kapler and City Engineer Steve Jankowski <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The purpose of this case is to discuss the goal of paving the remaining dirt roadways in the City. <br />Ramsey currently has 140 miles of roadway, of which only 5.67 miles remain unpaved. With so <br />few unpaved streets left in the City, the cost of grading them has become expensive on a per-mile <br />basis. The grader, which travels at low road speeds, requires an ever-increasing percentage of its <br />time traveling to the site as opposed to performing the actual grading work. <br /> <br />Some streets are in need of a total "facelift," which would involve removing mailboxes, grading <br />in displaced material, adding material, finish grading, and replacement of mailboxes. Typically, <br />the City does not assess for work/improvement to unpaved streets even though this effort may be <br />considered an improvement. <br /> <br />Several issues for which input is sought fr6m the Committee include: <br /> <br />· Is paving the remaining dirt streets a priority goal? <br /> What incentives for paving might be considered appropriate? <br /> > Capping the assessment <br /> > Eliminating the assessment <br /> > Allowing the street to be assessed for applying Class 5 <br /> > Billing property owners for grading <br />· Conduct an interest survey on the remaining dirt streets <br />· Choose streets with highest maintenance demands and prioritize for earliest paving <br />· Begin assessing for "facelift" type of improvements <br /> Compare cost of ongoing maintenance to cost of paving - foreword to residents for <br /> opinion/vote <br />· Continue the status quo <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />City Engineer <br />Director of Public Works <br />Public Works Supervisor <br /> <br />PW: 06/15/99 <br /> <br />~R`~-F$~L~users~City Shared Fi~e~PWC~mmit~999~`~une[Dirt Street Paving Case.d~c 06/11/99 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.