Laserfiche WebLink
PW CASE # 4 <br /> <br />UPDATE ON STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY IMPLEMENTATION <br /> By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />On November 23, 1999, the City Council introduced an ordinance creating a storm drainage <br />utility. The adoption of this ordinance should have been scheduled for the December 14 Council <br />meeting, but was omitted from the agenda due to an oversight. The adoption of the ordinance <br />will be placed on the December 21, 1999, Council meeting agenda. The funds generated by this <br />utility are anticipated to fund a number of construction projects in 2000 including (1) cleaning of <br />County Ditch 43, (2) the Juniper Ridge Drive storm sewer, (3) the 149th Avenue storm sewer, <br />and (4) the 164th Lane storm sewer. It is therefore important that the City initiate collection of <br />the utility charges as soon as possible. The purpose of this case is to provide an overview of <br />what tasks need to be completed before charges can be placed on quarterly utility bills, and <br />provide a schedule for completing those tasks. A secondary goal is to solicit committee input on <br />informing the public of the impending charges and the function of the storm drainage utility. <br /> <br />The first opportunity for billing will occur in the April 2000 utility billing. The storm drainage <br />utility charge will be added to five other City charges that appear on local utility billings. These <br />charges include sanitary sewer, municipal water, subdivision streetlights, priority streetlights, <br />and recycling. <br /> <br />One major task facing staff will be to detemfine the areas of commercial properties subject to the <br />storm drainage utility charge. We have a listing of approximately 350 utility customers who are <br />classified as commercial accounts. We believe the actual number of commercial accounts that <br />should be subject to the storm drainage utility rate to be about half of this number. One reason <br />for the difference stems from the fact that there may be multiple meters on the same property. <br />Another factor is that strip malls and multi-tenant facilities have many individual utility <br />accounts. A second task will be to identify those parcels having on-site ponding, which should <br />receive consideration for a reduction in their charges. Staff is estimating that with the assistance <br />of a part-time employee, perhaps the environmental specialist, these tasks could be completed by <br />mid-March. Once the proper information is supplied to Connexus, only two to three weeks is <br />estimated to be required to update their billing system. Finally, staff believes some information <br />should be provided to the public before the implementation of the charge. An article in the <br />Ramsey Resident would be appropriate; however, additional advertisement may be desirable <br />such as a special mailing or a cable TV program. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />None required. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br />City Administrator <br />Director of Public Works <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br />PW: 12/21/99 <br /> <br /> <br />