Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning Bulletin April 10, 2011 I Volume 5 I No. 7 <br />See also: Schwartz v. Town Plan and Zoning Commission for Town of <br />Hamden, 168 Conn. 20, 357 A.2d 495 (1975). <br />See also: Cole v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of Town of Cornwall, 30 <br />Conn. App. 511, 620 A.2d 1324 (1993). <br />Case Note: In its decision, the court had explained that Andrews <br />could have shown standing to challenge the adoption of the Amend- <br />ment if he could establish classical aggrievement or statutory ag- <br />grievement. To establish he was classically aggrieved, Andrews <br />would have to show: (1) a specific personal and legal interest in the <br />decision, as distinguished from the general interest of the commu- <br />nity as a whole; and (2) that the specific personal and legal interest <br />had been specially and injuriously affected by the decision. Howev- <br />er, Andrews did not have to prove either of those prongs because <br />he was statutorily aggrieved under § 8-8(a)(1), which only required <br />that he show that he owned land abutting or within a radius of 100 <br />feet of the newly zoned area. <br />Case Note: The court's decision also addressed the standing of inter- <br />vening plaintiffs —owners of property from other parts of town who <br />also challenged the PZC's adoption of the Amendment. The court <br />found those plaintiffs did not have standing under an environmental <br />protection statute to challenge the Amendment. <br />Grounds For Denial —Commission Denies <br />Developer's Plat on Ground That It Does Not <br />Meet "Purposes" of Zoning Code <br />Developer argues plat must be approved since use is <br />permitted and plat complies with zoning standards <br />Citation: Pomeranc-Burke, LLC v. Wicomico Environmental Trust, <br />Ltd., 2011 WL 711995 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2011) <br />MARYLAND (03/02/11)—This case addressed the issue of whether, <br />when a proposed use is a permitted use in a zoning district, and the plat <br />complies with specific statutory (i.e., zoning code) standards, a zoning <br />board can deny approval of the plat on the ground that it does not meet <br />the purposes of the code or the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Background/Facts: Pomeranc-Burke, LLC ("PB") sought approval <br />from the county planning and zoning commission (the "Commission") <br />of a preliminary plat for a "cluster subdivision" (the "subdivision"). The <br />© 2011 Thomson Reuters 7 <br />