Laserfiche WebLink
April 25, 2011 I Volume 5 I No. 8 Zoning Bulletin <br />The court explained that a variance runs with the land and is not <br />personal to the parties applying for it. For that reason, any condi- <br />tions attached to a variance "must be stated explicitly on the cer- <br />tificate of variance recorded in the land records." Here, the first <br />variance contained conditions that: all construction had to be in <br />conformity with standards put forth by the Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency ("FEMA"); and replanting of beach grass be <br />scheduled for early spring. The second variance contained a con- <br />dition that the air conditioning unit meet specified efficiency stan- <br />dards. The court found: "There was no condition placed on the <br />certificates that would give anyone knowledge that the [Anatras] <br />or the future owners of [the] property forever would be precluded <br />from modifying the property in any manner that was inconsistent <br />with the plans submitted at that time that the [Anatras]'s varianc- <br />es were granted, even if such modifications fully complied with the <br />zoning regulations." Because "[t]he conditions [of the prior vari- <br />ances] did not restrict the [Anatras] from seeking to construct an <br />uncovered deck within the scope of the regulation," the Anatras did <br />not now need to obtain modifications to those variances in order to <br />construct the deck, concluded the court. <br />See also: Dodson Boatyard, LLC v. Planning and Zoning Com'n of <br />Town of Stonington, 77 Conn. App. 334, 823 A.2d 371 (2003). <br />See also: Reid v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Lebanon, 235 <br />Conn. 850, 670 A.2d 1271 (1996). <br />Zoning News from Around the Nation <br />ARIZONA <br />Governor Jan Brewer recently signed a law that "gives rescue <br />ranches a chance to seek agricultural status and win exemption <br />from county zoning and building codes." <br />Source: The Arizona Republic; www.azcentral.com <br />CONNECTICUT <br />Westport's Planning and Zoning Commission is considering a <br />proposal to amend Westport's zoning regulations to exempt from <br />the definition of "structure" all swing and play sets that are not <br />buildings, as defined in the regulations. The proposal also seeks to <br />exempt swing and play sets from the town's setback requirements. <br />Source: Westport News; www.westbort-news.com <br />10 © 2011 Thomson Reuters <br />