Laserfiche WebLink
• The 60-day time period is stopped, while other necessary state or federal approvals are <br />being sought. <br />• The 60-day time period does not apply to applications for subdivision approval. (The <br />subdivision statute Minn Stat. Sec. 462.358, subd. 3b provides its own time periods of 120 <br />days for preliminary plat approval and 60 days for final plat approval.) <br />Elements of the Law <br />What is a "written request" for purposes of starting the 60-day period? <br />What constitutes a "written request" has been the subject of several court decisions. For instance, it <br />has been argued that a request submitted on the back of a napkin was enough to start the clock. <br />The courts also have found that submission of a request in a letter or as part of a settlement <br />proposal may be enough to start the time running The 2003 legislature clarified the law in this <br />regard by defining a written request as a submission on a city approved application form, or if <br />there is no form, submission in writing with the specific governmental approval sought listed on <br />the first page of the document. <br />What about an incomplete application? <br />If the city receives an application that does not include all the city required information, the clock <br />does not begin to run, if within 15 days of receipt of the application, the city informs the applicant <br />in writing that the application is incomplete and what information is missing. (This timeframe was <br />increased by the 2003 Legislature from 10 to 15 days.) <br />Therefore, the city should give some thought to being clear about exactly what information it <br />requires for various types of land use applications. The city may want to consider developing a <br />checklist and reviewing its zoning ordinances to make explicit what items are required. This will <br />not only help the applicant, but will act as a sort of fail-safe mechanism for city staff who need to <br />thoroughly evaluate applications within the first 15 days. <br />What is considered "related to zoning?" <br />It is useful to look at the precise wording of the statute — <br />Minn. Stat. Sec. 15.99 subd. 2 (2011) — to see that the <br />statute, on its face, covers much more than just requests <br />"related to zoning." <br />"Except as otherwise provided in this section, <br />section 462.358 subd. 3b, or 473.175, or chapter <br />505, and notwithstanding any other law to the <br />contrary, an agency must approve or deny within <br />60 days a written request relating to zoning, <br />septic systems, watershed district review, soil <br />and water conservation district review, or <br />expansion of the metropolitan urban service area <br />for a permit, license, or other governmental <br />approval of an action." <br />// <br />Hihliht <br />The law allows cities a 60-day <br />extension to consider an <br />application if the city follows <br />specific statutory requirements. <br />To do so, cities must provide the <br />landowner a written explanation <br />during the initial 60-day period <br />that details the reasons for the <br />extension and the anticipated <br />`length of the extension. fJ <br />The courts have been rather expansive in their interpretation of the phrase "related to zoning." <br />2 <br />