My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/02/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:16:22 AM
Creation date
9/16/2003 9:26:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/02/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Seven industrial parks currently share the corridor. Aesthetic <br />standards help to create cohesiveness while retaining individual <br />park identity. Thc parks have comparable ingress and egress design, <br />access points, a three-story height limit, building material <br />restrictions, and centralized parking and park-and-ride features. <br />According to Michael Cade of the Economic Development <br />Council, open communication between the public and private <br />entities, especially zoning and planning officials, has been the <br />biggest asset in ensuring the corridor's success. <br /> Chicago's 22 industrial corridors are part ora comprehensive <br />economic development initiative to link predefined industrial areas. <br />Retaining Chicago's ability to meet the needs of industrial interests <br />while allowing for neighborhood growth and development was <br />considered essential in the corridor development plans. <br /> Industrial corridors are a zoning overlay that allows for <br />greater flexibility to meet industry's changing needs. To assure <br />stable land use within the corridors, proposals for nonindustrial <br />development in the corridors are required to undergo full review <br />through the planned development process. City planners are <br />given full consideration of the operational needs of existing <br />industries when reviewing propOsals to rezone property near <br />industrial corridors and when updating the existing zoning <br />standards for manufacturing districts. <br /> According to Donna Ducharme, former deputy commissioner <br />for the city's Department of Planning and Development, each <br />industrial corridor plan has five objectives: to ensure safety, <br />accessibility and function, competitiveness and marketability, <br />manageability, and attractiveness. Designated improvements to the <br />Ravenswood Model Corridor project improvements include <br />viaduct enhancements, park-and-ride facilities, decorative lighting, <br />an external building improvements program, landscaping, security <br />initiatives, and traffic md public transit studies. A preliminary <br />budget of $1.25 million wag proposed for the project. <br /> <br />Species, Environment, and <br />River Conservation Corridors <br />Conservation-related corridors are defined by the Ninth U.S. <br />Circuit Court of Appeals (1990) as "avenues along which wide- <br />ranging animals can travel, plants can propagate, genetic <br />interchange can occur, populations can move in response to <br />environmental changes and natural disasters, and threatened <br />species can be replenished from other areas." <br /> Protecting core reserves and landscape connectivity for <br />species conservation is the goal of the Sky Island/Greater Gila <br />environmental corridor, spanning from Arizona and New <br />Mexico south to Mexico. An acknowledgment of mating needs <br />and migration patterns of area species prompted a coalition of <br />environmental organizations to support a corridor preservation <br />plan. Plan proponent Andy Holdsworth, Sky Island Alliance's <br />Arizona field coordinator, recognizes the importance of working <br />cooperatively with other stakeholders, including county <br />planning departments in both states and Mexico. <br /> Holdsworth says a critical element in biological corridor <br />development is the need to maintain or restore functional <br />connectivity, or provide flexible corridor boundaries to <br />accommodate species' changing needs. If adopted into actual <br />corridor planning efforts, the concept will require zoning <br />solutions such as overlays and interim uses. <br /> <br />Historic and Heritage Corridors <br />Also evolving out of corridor planning are historic or heritage <br />linkages. The Royal Missionary Road of the Californias corridor <br />stretches from the Los Cabos region in Mexico north to <br /> <br />Sonoma, California. The historical significance of the corridor <br />dates back to the establishment of the Mission Nuestra <br />Senorade Loreto in 1697. Mission and archaeological sites, <br />ancient structures, and important ecological zones add to the <br />corridor's unique heritage. Preservation efforts are being led by a <br />diverse team of stakeholders in Mexico together with a group <br /> <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />Corridor sigwage placement map taken Jgom Chicago's <br />Ravenswood Industrial Corridor Strategic Development <br />Plan for Ind, strial Rete'ntion and F~pansion. Efforts are <br />underway to improve the accessibility and. function of the <br />city's corridors, <br /> <br />that represents wide-ranging American interests, including <br />California's parks and recreation department. <br /> In the East, corridor planning was presented in numerous <br />bills to link historic locations such as revolutionary war sites so <br />tourists can more easily follow the history of the region. <br />American heritage corridors would be a "museum without <br />wails," says Connecticut State Representative Sherwood <br />Boehlert (R-New Hartford). The legislation recommended a <br />partnership between the federal and local governments to <br />coordinate corridor improvements such as road signs and better <br />preservation of historic sites. ~: <br /> <br />Corridor Planning Challenges <br /> <br />Achieving broad participation and s~akeholder cooperation is a <br />major challenge ofcorrldor planning. In 1992, the Oregon <br />Department of Transportation (ODOT) adopted the Oregon <br />Transportation Plan to address corridor planning. A case study <br />tracked the experience of ODOT in its efforts to develop a <br />corridor plan, parts of which would have to be adopted and/or <br />implemented by 34 local jurisdictions and four other state and <br />federal agencies. A key element of the process was the creation <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.