Laserfiche WebLink
January 25, 1999 -- Page 3 <br /> <br /> he stored inoperable vehicles on it. <br /> The warnings gave Adams 10 days to comply with the ordinance. When <br /> Adams didn't, the city cited him. <br /> The court found Adams expanded the use of.his property to a nonconform- <br /> ing use. It fined him $400, but he still didn't correct the violations. · <br /> Photos of Adams' lots showed shrubbery growing through abandoned ve- <br />hicles, numerous trash dumpsters filled with industrial debris and refuse, and <br />weeds and grass grown too high. A compliance officer said he had seen trash, <br />car parts, batteries, plastic bags, bathtubs, paint cont~ainers, and other miscella- <br />neous debris strewn about. The vehicles and dumpsters weren't allowed in a <br />C-3 area. <br /> About two years later, the court found Adams guilty of expanding a non- <br />conforming -use on one lot, failing to maintain his other property, and storing <br />abandoned autos on and failing to maintain a third lot. <br /> Adams appealed. He argued his parcels were improperly zoned and that his <br />neighbors used their land f6r ':I[ght-industrial" purposes. <br />DECISION: Affirmed. <br /> Adams violated the zoning"ordinance. <br /> The vehicles and dumpsters.weren't permitted in a C-3 area, and only fully <br />conforming auto businesses were allowed to store junk or abandoned autos for <br />more than 30 days. <br /> The ordinance didn't allow grass and weeds taller than 10 inches, the accu- <br />mulation of refuse in an unsightly manner, stagnant pools of water that at- <br />tracted insects, the dumping of waste without a permit, and the overgrowth of <br />vegetation to impede public rights-of-way ail of which were present on <br />Adams' properties. <br />see also: Lever v. State, 971 S.W. 2d 762 (1998). <br />see also: City of Harrison v. Wilson, 453 S. W. 2d 730 (1970). <br /> <br />Utilities -- Natural gas producer wants to build'compressor as 'public <br />service facility' <br /> <br />Citation: Hernley Family Trust v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing Board, <br />Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, No. 1133 C.D. 1998 (1998) <br /> <br /> Lomak Operating Company wanted to build a natural gas compressor in <br />Fayette County, Pa. A group of neighbors opposed the plan. <br /> Lomak was a publicly owned company that operated many natural gas <br />wells in the area. The compressor site would allow it to pressurize gas for <br />interstate transportation through a nearby pipeline. Lomak only produced the <br />gas; it didn't sell gas to the public, so the state public utility commission didn't <br />regulate it. <br /> The pressurization process heated the gas, so then machinery had to cool it. <br />The compressor itself produced significant exhaust noise, but the neighbors <br />objected more strongly to the cooling unit's sound. The compressor site would <br /> <br /> <br />