Laserfiche WebLink
along any facade abutting public parking areas. Such <br />sidewalks shall be located at least six feet from the facade of <br />the building to provide planting beds for foundation <br />landscaping. <br /> <br />In'_'ernal pedestrian walkways must provide a weather <br />protection feature such as an awning within 30 feet ofatl <br />customer entrances. <br /> <br />The internal pedestrian walkways must be distinguished <br />from driving surfaces through the use of special pavers, <br />bricks, or scored concrete to enhance pedestrian safety and <br />the attractiveness of the walkways. <br /> <br />Projections/recesses <br />must comprise at least <br />20 percent of the <br />facade length, with a <br />minimum depth of <br />three percent of the <br />facade length. <br /> <br />Close-up examples of some of the detailingj%m a development. <br /> <br /> Parking Lots. Fort Collins also considered the size and <br />location ofparklng spaces that usually provide the foreground <br />for superstores. The regulations encourage structures to be <br />located closer to streets, and parking areas to be broken up into <br />modules separated by landscaping and other features. After <br />much discussion and compromise, it was determined that "no <br />more than fifty percent of the off-street parking area for the lot, <br />tract, or area of land devoted to the large retail establishment <br />shall be located between the front facade of the principal <br />building and the abutting streets." <br /> <br />Fort Collins Case Studies <br />While several smaller big-box projects have gotten underway <br />using the city's new regulations, two large proposals have tested <br />the applications ofs.uperstore regulations. The first project <br /> <br /> involved a 307,000-square-foot retail "power center." The threa <br /> buildings in the development (29,000 square feet, 106,000 · <br /> square feet, and 134,000 square feet) were required to meet all <br /> of the standards. <br /> The design features of the project include parking distributed <br /> around the principal building, multiple building entrances, <br /> buildings moved closer to the street, and unique architecture <br /> facades'that remain consistent throughout the center. The <br /> defining feature of the development is a clearly identified, <br /> central pedestrian/gathering area between two buildings. The <br /> development review process provided an opportunity to create a <br /> unique space within the development. The finished product <br /> incorporates many features particular to downtown Fort <br /> Collins, including downtown-style facades, distinctive <br /> light fixtures, special paving, and diagonal parking. <br /> The success of the project is reflected in the short <br /> period of time it took to lease nearly all the space. <br /> Tenants include Home Depot, PetSmart, and a <br /> 70,000-square-foot supermarket. <br /> The second project was a 340,000-square- <br />foot shopping center that included a proposed <br /> 194,000-square-foot Wal-Mart. One <br /> additional 84,000-square-foot multi-tenant <br /> building was also required to meet the big <br /> box standards. The developer submitted a <br /> site plan with architectural features that <br /> easily met the requirements of the code. <br /> However, the site planning requirements <br /> (particularly the parking requirements) <br /> slowed down the development review <br /> process. Corporate officials hesitated until <br /> the last moment before the public hearing <br /> on the issue of distributing parking around <br /> the building. The officials remained <br /> adamant about placing the majority of the <br /> parking in front the buildings' primary facades, perhaps to lure <br /> customers into the building entrance. The project was <br /> redesigned to meet the big box standards, but was ultimately <br /> turned down by the city's planning and zoning board because <br /> of traffic impacts. The city council upheld the board's decision <br /> on appeal. <br /> <br />Conclusion · <br />While the City of Fort Collins has met with success in <br />implementing the adopted Standards and GuideBnes for Large <br />Retail Establishments, the debate continues over the practicality <br />of some of the standards---especially the requirements for <br />multiple entries and the distribution of parking around the <br />buildings. Any community considering the adoption of <br />standards similar to those in Fort Collins should be aware that <br />these two issues will likely be controversial. Fortunately, there <br />are an increasing number of examples of successful big box <br />developments that comply with such requirements. <br /> The Fort Collins experience clearly demonstrates that <br />community design standards can improve the look and function <br />of big box retail stores and other developments. For such <br />standards to work, however, communities must be prepared to <br />meet with occasional resistance, or even turn down a proposal <br />that will not ultimately benefit the community. A final resolu- <br />tion will undoubtedly be a mix of&sign, economic, and <br />political considerations. <br /> For additional information on the city's standards, contact <br />the Fort Collins Planning Department. at 970-221-6750. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />