Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 -- May 10, 1999 Z.B. , , <br /> <br />Special Permit m Town denies permit for motorcycle business based on <br />noise concerns <br /> <br /> NEW YORK (3/9/99) -- Baker started Ultimate Custom Cycle Inc., planning <br /> to sell "high-end" motorcycles. Ultimate rented a new commercial building in <br /> Greenburgh, N.Y. <br /> The building needed extensive renovations, which Ultimate wanted to com- <br /> plete in time to open for business by the beginning of the summer -- the busi- <br /> est time of the year in that industry. The town issued Ultimate a certificate of <br /> occupancy and a building permit for renovations. Construction proceeded at a <br /> "fast and expensive pace" to enable the business to open by mid-June. <br /> The property was zoned "intermediate business," which allowed retail and <br />personal service establishments, professional offices, warehouses, public parks, <br />and playgrounds. Motor vehicle repair and retail establishments needed a spe- <br />cial permit. To get a special permit Ultimate had to show, among other things, <br />that its proposed use was harmonious with the orderly development of the <br />area. Businesses in the area included a truck rental business, a factory, a tele- <br />phone company facility with a truck and supply lot, and a refrigeration supply <br />company. There were also four private homes in the area. <br /> Ultimate applied for a special permit in April 1998. At a public hearing, <br />Ultimate submitted documents showing it complied with all the special permit <br />requiremen, ts. A neighbor expressed concern about noise levels but admitted <br />there were already high noise levels in the area. Ultimate said it would operate <br />only during the daytime and said nearby highways would allow customers to <br />come to the shop without passing homes. Ultimate also promised to keep noise <br />levels down by not allowing test drives and by prohibiting customers from <br />revving their engines on its property. <br /> The zoning appeals board denied Ultimate's permit request, finding the <br />proposed business wouldn't be compatible with the area because of noise levels. <br /> Ultimate commissioned a traffic study, which found its business wouldn't <br />significantly impact the already high noise levels in the district. Based on the <br />traffic study, Ultimate asked the board to reconsider its decision. The board <br />refused, and Ultimate was forced to cancel its lease and to abandon its business <br />plans. <br /> Ultimate sued the town, arguing it acted arbitrarily. According to Ultimate, <br />the town's zoning ordinance violated its equal protection rights by allowing <br />some businesses as a matter of right while requiring other businesses to get a <br />special permit. <br /> The town asked the court to dismiss Ultimate's claims.' <br /> <br />DECISION: Claims dismissed, <br /> Ultimate wasn't entitled to the special permit. <br /> The board had broad discretion to deny special permits that would impair <br />the use, enjoyment, or value of nearby properties. The board denied Ultimate's <br />request based on its valid concern about increased noise levels. <br /> <br /> <br />