My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/07/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/07/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:18:08 AM
Creation date
9/16/2003 10:16:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/07/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 ~ July 10, 1999 Z.B. <br /> <br />failed to show its proposed mining operation would be in harmony with the <br />orderly development of the zoning district. <br /> Rifenburg appealed. It asked the court to annul the board's decision be- <br />cause it was arbitrary and capricious. The court denied Rifenburg's request. <br /> Rifenburg appealed again. <br /> <br />DECISION: Affirmed. <br /> Rifenburg didn't show it was entitled to a special permit. <br /> To be entitled to a special use permit, the applicant had to prove the pro- <br />posed use conformed with the zoning ordinance. If the proposed use did com- <br />ply with the zoning ordinance, then the municipality had to issue the permit <br />unless it had reasonable grounds for denying it. <br /> There was more than enough evidence to support the zoning board's find- <br />ing that the proposed mine wouldn't be in harmony with the neighborhood. A <br />traffic study concluded the mine would "compromise public safety" because <br />the gravel trucks would have to travel on a residential road and would pose a <br />danger to school buses. The study also found the access road and a local bridge <br />might not be able to handle the weight of the gray. el trucks. <br /> Moreover, the zoning ordinance required that the proposed use not impair <br />local property values. The board relied in part on the testimony of a real estate <br />expert who said the mine would have a serious negative impact on local prop- <br />erty values. <br /> <br />Ciplgerley v. Town of East Greenbush, Supreme Court of New York, Appellate <br />Div., 3rd Dept., No. 83939 (1999). <br /> <br />see also: Cit~periey v. Town of Ea'st Greenbush, 623 N.Y.S. 2d 967. <br /> <br />see also: Schadow v. Wilson, 599 N.Y.S. 2d 335. <br /> <br />Nuisance -- Neighbors claim abandoned trailer is breeding ground for rats <br /> <br />WISCONSIN (5/4/99) -- Schleis owned a warehouse in a Green Bay indus- <br />trial distr~ct. He parked a semi-trailer on the property in 1976 and has not moved <br />it since. <br /> The trailer, which Schleis used for storage, was visible from the road and <br />was partially surrounded by vegetation. Its tires were deflated and the wheels <br />had sunk into the ground. The area under the trailer was littered with construc- <br />tion debris, including cement blocks, bricks, and partially decomposed wood. <br /> The neighborhood consisted of several food manufacturing companies, <br />including a dairy plant, a meat packing plant, and a pizza crust producer. Alt <br />were subject to governmental health and safety regulations and inspections. <br /> In 1997, neighbors complained to the city about the trailer. The zoning <br />inspector investigated and ordered Schleis to remove the trailer and clean up <br />the surrounding area. Schleis refused, and the' city cited him for maintaining a <br />public nuisance. The city zoning ordinance defined a "public nuisance" to <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.