My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/19/1999 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/19/1999 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:18:21 AM
Creation date
9/16/2003 10:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
10/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
State regulations/standards/definitions of redevelopment areas. <br />(This question has been forwarded to Briggs & Morgan.) <br /> <br />What is the reason for urgency for the sale of bonds? <br /> <br />The City is attempting to sell the bonds before the end of the year in order to <br />avoid the unknown fluctuations in the underwriters' rates that may occur in <br />January. The City is attempting to creatively meet the immediate needs of the <br />City and still comply with the budgetary restrictions created by levy limits <br />imposed by the State Legislature. <br /> <br />As soon as the bond proceeds are received, the City can use the proceeds to <br />pay the architectural fees which are averaging about $3,000 per month. <br />Architect fees are not allowed to be reimbursed solely on passing of the <br />reimbursement resolution, which applies only to capital expenditures. <br /> <br />Why is the City not financing the project intemally through an inter-fund loan? <br /> <br />The City had originally intended for the Fire Hall project to be an interfund loan <br />through the Landfill Trust Fund. In adopting the proposed 2000 levy and <br />budget for 2000 it was decided at this time (September 1999) to add the first <br />year principal and interest of the fire stations bond payment to the proposed <br />2000 levy as a special levy. By placing the bond payment as a special levy, the <br />only way that this could be included without a referendum was to have the sale <br />of the bonds through the EDA. if the City was to have obtained a referendum, <br />the election would have needed to be held by September 1, 1999. By including <br />the bonds principal and interest payment as a special levy, this freed up <br />approximately $125,000 that the City had incorporated in its General Fund <br />Budget for 2000. This is not to say that the City then had an extra $125,000 to <br />do with as they may, as the General Fund Budget needed this additional <br />$125,000 to bring it closer to balancing the budget. The City's 2000 budgets <br />expenditures were exceeding revenues due to personnel additions, additional <br />services, and normal inflationary increases. <br /> <br />By including the fire station debt as part of the special levy, it was determined <br />that the cost would be more fairly distributed, as residents of the City will be <br />paying on the benefits of having an additional fire station for the next 20 years. <br />Thus, someone moving into the City in the next few years would help to pay <br />for the station, since they are also getting the benefit. <br />It must be remembered that a proposed levy is just that, proposed. A levy can <br />be decreased, but it cannot be increased. It was such that the fire station debt <br />was included. It can be determined at a later date that the City may not want to <br /> <br />· Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.