My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/19/1999 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
1999
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/19/1999 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:18:21 AM
Creation date
9/16/2003 10:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
10/19/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Are the equipment notes for new or replacement equipment? <br /> <br />The equipment notes are for both new and replacement equipment. The <br />portion of the notes that pertain to replacement equipment, is only that amount <br />which was not funded by the Equipment Replacement Fund. For instance, the <br />new price of the capital item exceeded the original purchase price. <br /> <br />Examples of equipment that are being purchased with the notes are <br /> New Capital Equipment: 3~d payment on fire truck $85,000 <br /> Hot Asphalt Mix Trailer $20,000 <br /> Extrication Tools $15,000 <br /> <br />Replacement Capital {Costs are Purchase price less replacement funding) <br /> Voting Machines $28,000 <br /> MDT's $42,000 <br /> Squad Cars $17,000 <br /> <br />Are the monies available in the equipment replacement fund? Why are they not <br />available or adequate to fund the total costs? <br /> <br />As stated above, not all of the capital equipment items are replacement items. <br />Funding for several of the replacement items from the Equipment <br />Replacement Fund is not sufficient, as the purchase price of new, similar items <br />has greatly exceeded the original purchase price. <br /> <br />Why wasn't this project discussed prior to this meeting? <br /> <br />The fire station project was not anticipated to need the EDA's input, and <br />planned prior to the restructuring of the EDA. This option for funding the <br />project was explored only within the last month, at the adoption of the <br />proposed 2000 budget and levy in September. The determination of such was <br />explained in question pertaining to inter-fund loan above.. With the other <br />demands on staff time, and the time to schedule and prepare for the October 4 <br />EDA meeting, two weeks was a relatively short time to bring this item before <br />the EDA for discussion. <br /> <br />Is this method of funding driven/initiated by the Ci.ty Council oi" by city staff?. <br /> <br />As stated above, this method was presented to City Council by staff at the time <br />of the proposed 2000 levy and budget being adopted. The City Council agreed <br />to this funding option to meet the budgetary needs of the City, with the <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.