Miscellaneous Info. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

] ] ] ] ] ] CITY OF RAMSEY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT/CAPITAL OUTLAY PLAN 1999-2003 Enclosed is the Ramsey Capital Improvements/Capital Outlay Plan (CIP) for the years I999 2003. It has been prepared in an attempt to anticipate major capital expenditures in advance of the year in which they are budget requests. Further, several projects may inten'elate or require other improvements prior to initiation which would cause delays without prior planning. Additionally, projects may require budgeting over several years or receipt of funds ~om other sources (i.e. grants) requiring planning completion prior to the funding year. Finally, the plan enables a snapshot of the identified capital needs of the community allowing for continual priodtization of these needs. Approval of the CIP by Council does not authorize spending or initiation of a given project. It does, however, provide a guide for the community for a whole array of private and public decision-making, impacted by public capital expenditures. Therefore, the CIP should receive ratification only if the Council perceives actions contemplated within the plan as reasonable and planned within justified time fi:ames. It shall further be noted that initial project design of public infrastructure projects identified within this plan often begins two years or more prior to the date of construction. The CIP is not intended to provide for precise budgeting. Capital costs are projected as estimates. Upon each update of the plan, deletions, additions, delays, or other revisions may occur, reflecting changing community needs. These changes allow for budget refinements as a particular project nears actual construction. Capital improvements are improvements to land, streets, parks, utilites and buildings. This plan shows improvements with revenues projected fi.om various funding sources. Improvements fi:om the General Fund are those requiring a tax levy, referendum or similar other authority resulting in listed projects being less than certain. The other funding sources (except for intergovernmental revenue - grant funds) have increased stability over the general fund projects.] Specific information on the 'funding sources for each project is shown under the individual project. Cash flow projections are completed to examine the long term stability of each fund and its ability to provide for planned expenditures. The plan does not contain a specific designation which denotes project priorities. There is not weighting or matq. hing of priorities between infi:astructure types [streets, parks, utilities, building facilities] as each type of project generally has a funding source unique to the project type and from which funds cannot be realloeated.